Abstract:Cognitive control helps us to overcome task interference in challenging situations. Resolving conflicts because of interfering influences is believed to rely on midfrontal theta oscillations. However, different sources of interference necessitate different types of control. Attentional control is needed to suppress salient distractors. Motor control is needed to suppress goal-incompatible action impulses. While previous studies mostly studied the additive effects of attentional and motor conflicts, we independently manipulated the need for attentional control (via visual distractors) and motor control (via unexpected response deviations) in an EEG study with male and female humans. We sought to find out whether these different types of control rely on the same midfrontal oscillatory mechanisms. Motor conflicts, but not attentional conflicts, elicited increases in midfrontal theta power during conflict resolution. Independent of the type of conflict, theta power was predictive of motor slowing. Connectivity analysis via phase-based synchronization indicated a widespread increase interbrain connectivity for motor conflicts, but a midfrontal-to-posterior decrease in connectivity for attentional conflicts. For each condition, we found stronger midfrontal connectivity with the parietal region contralateral to, rather than ipsilateral to, the acting hand. Parietal lateralization in connectivity was strongest for motor conflicts. Previous studies suggested that midfrontal theta oscillations might represent a general control mechanism, which aids conflict resolution independent of the conflict domain. In contrast, our results show that oscillatory theta dynamics during reactive control mostly reflect motor-related adjustments. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Humans need to exercise self-control over both their attention (to avoid distraction) and their motor activity (to suppress inappropriate action impulses). Midfrontal theta oscillations have been assumed to indicate a general control mechanism, which help to exert top-down control during both motor and sensory interference. We are using a novel approach for the independent manipulation of attentional and motor control to show that increases in midfrontal theta power and brainwide connectivity are linked to the top-down adjustments of motor responses, not sensory interference. These findings clarify the function of midfrontal theta dynamics as a key aspect of neural top-down control and help to dissociate domain-general from motor-specific aspects of self-control.

Neurophysiological Dynamics of Metacontrol States: EEG Insights into Conflict Regulation

EEG tensor decomposition delineates neurophysiological principles underlying conflict-modulated action restraint and action cancellation

Tracing conflict-induced cognitive-control adjustments over time using aperiodic EEG activity

Neuronal networks underlying the conjoint modulation of response selection by subliminal and consciously induced cognitive conflicts

Aperiodic neural activity reflects metacontrol in task-switching

The Dissociable Neural Dynamics of Cognitive Conflict and Emotional Conflict Control: an ERP Study

Metacontrol Regulates Creative Thinking: An EEG Complexity Analysis Based on Multiscale Entropy

Effects of contextualized emotional conflict control on domain-general conflict control: fMRI evidence of neural network reconfiguration

cTBS to Right DLPFC Modulates Physiological Correlates of Conflict Processing: Evidence from a Stroop task

Cognitive Control Explored by Linear Modelling Behaviour and Fmri Data During Stroop Tasks

Neural mass model-based study of frontal-temporal theta oscillations in human subjects during the performance of a cognitive control task

Interindividual aperiodic resting‐state EEG activity predicts cognitive‐control styles

Concurrent expectation and experience-based metacontrol: EEG insights and the role of working memory capacity

The neural dynamics of conflict adaptation induced by conflict observation: Evidence from univariate and multivariate analysis

The control patterns of affective processing and cognitive reappraisal: insights from brain controllability analysis

The neural network underlying individual differences in conflict adaptation effect

Conflict and Cognitive Control in the Brain

Spatiotemporal dynamics of selective attention and visual conflict monitoring using a Stroop task

Emotional Modulation of Conflict Processing in the Affective Domain: Evidence from Event-related Potentials and Event-related Spectral Perturbation Analysis

Motor Interference, But Not Sensory Interference, Increases Midfrontal Theta Activity and Brain Synchronization during Reactive Control

When conflict cannot be avoided: executive control dominates early selective sensory modulations during cognitive conflict