Abstract:Cognitive control refers to humans' ability to willingly align thoughts and actions with internally represented goals. Research indicates that cognitive control is not one-dimensional but rather integrates multiple sub-processes to cope with task demands successfully. In particular, the dynamic interplay between preparatory (i.e., prior to goal-relevant events) and adaptive (i.e., in response to unexpected demands) recruitment of neural resources is believed to facilitate successful behavioural performance. However, whether preparatory and adaptive processes draw from independent or shared neural resources, and how these align in the information processing stream, remains unclear. To address these issues, we recorded electroencephalographic data from 52 subjects while they performed a computerised task. Using a combination of mass-univariate and multivariate pattern analysis procedures, we found that different types of control triggered distinct sequences of brain activation patterns, and that the order and temporal extent of these patterns were dictated by the type of control used by the participants. Stimuli that fostered preparatory recruitment of control evoked a sequence of transient occipital-parietal, sustained central-parietal, and sustained fronto-central responses. In contrast, stimuli that indicated the need for quick behavioural adjustments triggered a sequence of transient occipital-parietal, fronto-central, and central parietal responses. There was also a considerable degree of overlap in the temporal evolution of these brain activation patterns, with behavioural performance being mainly related to the magnitude of the central-parietal and fronto-central responses. Our results demonstrate how different neurocognitive mechanisms, such as early attentional allocation and subsequent behavioural selection processes, are likely to contribute to cognitive control. Moreover, our findings extend prior work by showing that these mechanisms are engaged (at least partly) in parallel, rather than independently of each other.

Concurrent expectation and experience-based metacontrol: EEG insights and the role of working memory capacity

Dissociated roles of the parietal and frontal cortices in the scope and control of attention during visual working memory.

Aperiodic neural activity reflects metacontrol in task-switching

Neurocognitive dynamics of preparatory and adaptive cognitive control: Insights from mass-univariate and multivariate pattern analysis of EEG data

Involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex in time-based prospective memory task monitoring: An EEG analysis of brain sources using Independent Component and Measure Projection Analysis

Involuntary and Voluntary Processes Compete for Entering the Focus of Attention of Working Memory.

Task context load induces reactive cognitive control: An fMRI study on cortical and brain stem activity

Control in context: The theta rhythm provides evidence for reactive control but no evidence for proactive control

Metacognitive Processes in Executive Control Development: The Case of Reactive and Proactive Control

Dynamic prioritisation of sensory and motor contents in working memory

Timing characteristics of reactive and proactive emotion regulation

Effective modulation from the ventral medial to the dorsal medial portion of the prefrontal cortex in memory confidence-based behavioral control

Interindividual aperiodic resting‐state EEG activity predicts cognitive‐control styles

Working Memory Capacity Predicts Focus Back Effort under Different Task Demands

Prioritizing flexible working memory representations through retrospective attentional strengthening.

Neurophysiological Dynamics of Metacontrol States: EEG Insights into Conflict Regulation

Dynamic low frequency EEG phase synchronization patterns during proactive control of task switching

Metacontrol Regulates Creative Thinking: An EEG Complexity Analysis Based on Multiscale Entropy

Lateral prefrontal cortex controls interplay between working memory and actions

Nonfrontal Control of Working Memory

Brain Connectivity Modulation by Bayesian Surprise in Relation to Control Demand Drives Cognitive Flexibility Via Control Engagement