Abstract:Problem definition: Project outsourcing has been a pronounced trend in many industries but is also recognized as a major cause for project delays. We study how companies can coordinate outsourced projects with uncertain completion times through bilateral contract negotiations. Academic/practical relevance: Misaligned subcontractor incentives may result in substantial losses to both project clients and subcontractors. Coordinating subcontractors’ efforts through proper contracts is imperative to the success of project outsourcing. Most previous studies on project contracting have not addressed subcontractors’ bargaining powers or the dynamic bargaining process in negotiations. We fill in this gap by studying bilateral bargaining between the client and subcontractors, which better reflects real-world negotiations. Methodology: We model project contract negotiations as a multiunit bilateral bargaining game. We derive the conditions such that bilateral negotiations can achieve system coordination and characterize the equilibrium negotiation outcomes. We then compare the conditions and equilibria under various model settings to study their impact on project contracting. Results: Our study uncovers how the coordination of project outsourcing is impacted by the contract form, bargaining power structure, precedence network topology, payment timing, external opportunities, and negotiation protocols. For single-task projects, the widely used fixed-price (cost-plus) contract can achieve system coordination only when the subcontractor (client) possesses full bargaining power. Cost-sharing and time-based incentive contracts, which perform well for single-task projects, may not be effective for projects with parallel tasks when any subcontractor’s bargaining power is sufficiently high. Projects with serial tasks can be coordinated only under certain extreme bargaining power structures. Delaying payments always exacerbates the incentive misalignment. Managerial implications: Our analysis provides insights and guidelines to companies regarding how to select proper contract forms and payment timing schemes, based on the characteristics of the projects and subcontractors, to ensure the effectiveness of project outsourcing. Our results also highlight the importance of bargaining modeling in project contracting.

Control, coordination, and adaptation functions in construction contracts: A machine-coding model

Towards Automatic Smart-contract Codes Classification by Means of Word Embedding Model and Transaction Information

Application of large language models to intelligently analyze long construction contract texts

Construction Payment Automation Through Smart Contract-based Blockchain Framework

To what extent can smart contracts replace traditional contracts in construction project?

Formal Modeling of Smart Contracts for Quality Acceptance in Construction

An agent-based framework for supply chain coordination in construction

Construction contract risk identification based on knowledge-augmented language model

Knowing What is Going On--a Smart Contract for Modular Construction

A Study on the Economic Computation for Conflict Coordination of Project Contract

Coordinating Project Outsourcing Through Bilateral Contract Negotiations

Study On Contract Domain Ontology Supporting Bim Interactivity

Construction Contract Risk Identification Based on Knowledge-Augmented Language Models

Generalized Model for Explaining Construction Contract Disputes

Paid with Models: Optimal Contract Design for Collaborative Machine Learning

Effect of contractual functions on contractors' consummate performance behaviors in construction projects

Motivating Reliable Collaboration for Modular Construction: Shapley Value–Based Smart Contract

A knowledge representation approach for construction contract knowledge modeling

A review of agent-based modeling in construction management: an analytical framework based on multiple objectives

Latent Provisions for Building Information Modeling (BIM) Contracts: A Social Network Analysis Approach

A DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model with Loss Aversion for Contractor Selection