Abstract:Can instrumental variables be found from data? While instrumental variable (IV) methods are widely used to identify causal effect, testing their validity from observed data remains a challenge. This is because validity of an IV depends on two assumptions, exclusion and as-if-random, that are largely believed to be untestable from data. In this paper, we show that under certain conditions, testing for instrumental variables is possible. We build upon prior work on necessary tests to derive a test that characterizes the odds of being a valid instrument, thus yielding the name "necessary and probably sufficient". The test works by defining the class of invalid-IV and valid-IV causal models as Bayesian generative models and comparing their marginal likelihood based on observed data. When all variables are discrete, we also provide a method to efficiently compute these marginal likelihoods. We evaluate the test on an extensive set of simulations for binary data, inspired by an open problem for IV testing proposed in past work. We find that the test is most powerful when an instrument follows monotonicity---effect on treatment is either non-decreasing or non-increasing---and has moderate-to-weak strength; incidentally, such instruments are commonly used in observational studies. Among as-if-random and exclusion, it detects exclusion violations with higher power. Applying the test to IVs from two seminal studies on instrumental variables and five recent studies from the American Economic Review shows that many of the instruments may be flawed, at least when all variables are discretized. The proposed test opens the possibility of data-driven validation and search for instrumental variables.

Testing overidentifying restrictions on high-dimensional instruments and covariates

A Heteroscedasticity-Robust Overidentifying Restriction Test with High-Dimensional Covariates

Testing Endogeneity with High Dimensional Covariates

Necessary and Probably Sufficient Test for Finding Valid Instrumental Variables

Testability of Instrumental Variables in Additive Nonlinear, Non-Constant Effects Models

Instrument Validity for Heterogeneous Causal Effects

Overidentification in Shift-Share Designs

Weak identification with many instruments

Penalized Independence Rule for Testing High-Dimensional Hypotheses

An Identification and Dimensionality Robust Test for Instrumental Variables Models

Testing Partial Instrument Monotonicity

Testing Independence Between Exogenous Variables and Unobserved Errors

The Validity of Instruments Revisited

Identification and Inference with Invalid Instruments

Using negative controls to identify causal effects with invalid instrumental variables

Confidence Intervals for Causal Effects with Invalid Instruments using Two-Stage Hard Thresholding

Testability of Instrumental Variables in Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Causal Models

CHARACTERISTIC FUNCTION BASED TESTING FOR CONDITIONAL INDEPENDENCE: A NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSION APPROACH

A weak instrument [Formula: see text]-test in linear IV models with multiple endogenous variables

A test of non-identifying restrictions and confidence regions for partially identified parameters

Pairwise Valid Instruments