Abstract:Can instrumental variables be found from data? While instrumental variable (IV) methods are widely used to identify causal effect, testing their validity from observed data remains a challenge. This is because validity of an IV depends on two assumptions, exclusion and as-if-random, that are largely believed to be untestable from data. In this paper, we show that under certain conditions, testing for instrumental variables is possible. We build upon prior work on necessary tests to derive a test that characterizes the odds of being a valid instrument, thus yielding the name "necessary and probably sufficient". The test works by defining the class of invalid-IV and valid-IV causal models as Bayesian generative models and comparing their marginal likelihood based on observed data. When all variables are discrete, we also provide a method to efficiently compute these marginal likelihoods. We evaluate the test on an extensive set of simulations for binary data, inspired by an open problem for IV testing proposed in past work. We find that the test is most powerful when an instrument follows monotonicity---effect on treatment is either non-decreasing or non-increasing---and has moderate-to-weak strength; incidentally, such instruments are commonly used in observational studies. Among as-if-random and exclusion, it detects exclusion violations with higher power. Applying the test to IVs from two seminal studies on instrumental variables and five recent studies from the American Economic Review shows that many of the instruments may be flawed, at least when all variables are discretized. The proposed test opens the possibility of data-driven validation and search for instrumental variables.

Pairwise Valid Instruments

Valid Causal Inference with (Some) Invalid Instruments

Instrument Validity for Heterogeneous Causal Effects

Instrumental Variables Estimation with Some Invalid Instruments and its Application to Mendelian Randomization

Necessary and Probably Sufficient Test for Finding Valid Instrumental Variables

Identification and Inference with Invalid Instruments

On the instrumental variable estimation with many weak and invalid instruments

BudgetIV: Optimal Partial Identification of Causal Effects with Mostly Invalid Instruments

Two Robust Tools for Inference about Causal Effects with Invalid Instruments

Sequential Underspecified Instrument Selection for Cause-Effect Estimation

High-dimensional Model-assisted Inference for Local Average Treatment Effects with Instrumental Variables

Weak identification with many instruments

Testability of Instrumental Variables in Additive Nonlinear, Non-Constant Effects Models

Testing Partial Instrument Monotonicity

Selecting Valid Instrumental Variables in Linear Models with Multiple Exposure Variables: Adaptive Lasso and the Median-of-Medians Estimator

A vector monotonicity assumption for multiple instruments

Confidence Intervals for Causal Effects with Invalid Instruments using Two-Stage Hard Thresholding

Testing overidentifying restrictions on high-dimensional instruments and covariates

LASSO-type instrumental variable selection methods with an application to Mendelian randomization

Instrumental variables: A non-asymptotic viewpoint

The Validity of Instruments Revisited