Multifunctional Fluoroethylene Carbonate for Improving High-Temperature Performance of LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 ||SiO x @Graphite Lithium-Ion Batteries

Yuanyuan Kang,Jun Wang,Man Wang,Xiwu Tang,Zongze Cao,Chaoyang Wang,Qiao Shi,Yunxian Qian,Yonghong Deng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.0c01679
IF: 6.4
2020-10-15
ACS Applied Energy Materials
Abstract:LiNi<sub>0.8</sub>Mn<sub>0.1</sub>Co<sub>0.1</sub>O<sub>2</sub>||SiO<sub><i>x</i></sub>@graphite has received great attention in both academia and industry because it has the highest energy density among state-of-the-art commercial lithium-ion batteries. However, it suffers from severe capacity decay during high-temperature cycling or storage, which still needs to be addressed for its commercialization. In this work, fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) is employed as an additive or a cosolvent to improve the high-temperature performance of 1 Ah LiNi<sub>0.8</sub>Mn<sub>0.1</sub>Co<sub>0.1</sub>O<sub>2</sub>||SiO<sub><i>x</i></sub>@graphite pouch cells. By adding 5% FEC as additive, the capacity retention increases from 54.5% to 67.0% after 100 cycles at 45 °C. The use of FEC as a cosolvent further increases the capacity retention to 83.3%. The improvement is ascribed to the multifunctional effects from FEC, preventing electrolyte decomposition, mitigating the resistance increment and Mn ions dissolution with the formation of the interface films, which consist of LiF and LiPO<sub><i>x</i></sub>F<sub><i>y</i></sub> species. Therefore, the employment of FEC is of great importance for the development of high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acsaem.0c01679?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsaem.0c01679</a>.(Figure S1) Cycling performance of the NMC811||SiO<sub><i>x</i></sub>@Gr pouch cells with different electrolyte systems at 0.3 C and room temperature for 100 cycles; (Figure S2) EIS of the NMC811||SiO<sub><i>x</i></sub>@Gr pouch cells after formation and 100 cycles at 0.3 C and 45 °C; (Figure S3) SEM images of the NMC811 cathodes at raw state and after 100 cycles with the blank, 5% FEC system, and 30% FEC system; (Figure S4) TEM results of the SiO<sub><i>x</i></sub>@Gr anodes after 100 cycles for the three systems and at raw state; (Figure S5) GC-MS chromatograms of the three electrolytes after formation and 100 cycles at 45 °C; (Table S1) charge/discharge capacities and Coulombic efficiency in the first formation cycle of the NMC811||SiO<sub><i>x</i></sub>@Gr pouch cells using the three electrolyte systems; (Table S2) charge/discharge specific capacities of the NMC811 electrodes using different electrolyte systems in the voltage range of 3.0–4.2 V at 0.3 <i>C</i> and 45 °C; (Table S3) charge/discharge specific capacities of the SiO<sub><i>x</i></sub>@Gr anodes using different electrolyte in the voltage range of 0.005–4.2 V at 0.3 <i>C</i> and 45 °C; (Table S4) The main electrolyte components detected from GC-MS for the three electrolyte systems after formation and 100 cycles; (Table S5) LC-QTOF-MS results collected from the electrolytes after 100 cycles; (Table S6) LC-QTOF-MS results collected from the NMC811 cathodes after 100 cycles; (Table S7) LC-QTOF-MS results collected from the SiO<sub><i>x</i></sub>@Gr anodes after 100 cycles (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsaem.0c01679/suppl_file/ae0c01679_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,energy & fuels
What problem does this paper attempt to address?