Comparison of Surgical Outcomes After Posterior Decompression by Junior or Senior Surgeons for Patients With Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Results From Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Toshiki Okubo,Narihito Nagoshi,Hitoshi Kono,Yoshiomi Kobayashi,Osahiko Tsuji,Ryoma Aoyama,Norihiro Isogai,Shinichi Ishihara,Kazuki Takeda,Masahiro Ozaki,Satoshi Suzuki,Morio Matsumoto,Masaya Nakamura,Kota Watanabe,Ken Ishii,Junichi Yamane
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241260725
2024-06-05
Global Spine Journal
Abstract:Global Spine Journal, Ahead of Print. Study DesignRetrospective multicenter study.ObjectivesTo investigate surgical outcomes following posterior decompression for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) when performed by board-certified spine (BCS) or non-BCS (NBCS) surgeons.MethodsWe included 203 patients with cervical OPLL who were followed for a minimum of 1 year after surgery. Demographic information, medical history, and imaging findings were collected. Clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at the final follow-up using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and the visual analog scale (VAS) for the neck. We compared outcomes between BCS surgeons, who must meet several requirements, including experience in more than 300 spinal surgeries, and NBCS surgeons.ResultsBCS surgeons performed 124 out of 203 cases, while NBCS surgeons were primary in 79 cases, with 73.4% were directly supervised by a BCS surgeon. There was no statistically significant difference in surgical duration, estimated blood loss, and perioperative complication rates between the BCS and NBCS groups. Moreover, no statistically significant group differences were observed in each position of the C2-7 angle and cervical range of motion at preoperation and the final follow-up. Preoperative and final follow-up JOA scores, VAS for the neck, and JOA score recovery rate were comparable between the two groups.ConclusionsSurgical outcomes, including functional recovery, complication rates, and cervical dynamics, were comparable between the BCS and NBCS groups. Consequently, posterior decompression for cervical OPLL is considered safe and effective when conducted by junior surgeons who have undergone training and supervision by experienced spine surgeons.
clinical neurology,orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?