Two‐level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion versus Posterior Open‐door Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Comparison of the Clinical Impact on the Occipito‐Atlantoaxial Complex

Junhu Li,Qiujiang Li,Linnan Wang,Zhipeng Deng,Shuxin Zheng,Lei Wang,Yueming Song
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14092
2024-05-23
Orthopaedic Surgery
Abstract:Both two‐level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (t‐ACCF) and posterior open‐door laminoplasty (ODLP) are effective surgical procedures for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). The cervical spine is divided into the upper and the subaxial cervical spine (UCS, SCS), due to its different anatomical structure leads to considerable mechanical differences. At the same time, the corresponding changes produced by the UCS and SCS cause some compensatory responses that have some effect on the structure and function of the cervical spine. previous studies have identified different effects of different surgical procedures on the UCS and SCS, however, there are no studies on the effects of t‐ACCF and ODLP on the occipito‐atlantoaxial complex. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the changes in sagittal parameters and range of motion (ROM) of the occipito‐atlantoaxial complex in OPLL patients treated with t‐ACCF and ODLP. Objective Both two‐level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (t‐ACCF) and posterior open‐door laminoplasty (ODLP) are effective surgical procedures for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Previous studies have identified different effects of different surgical procedures on the upper and subaxial cervical spine (UCS, SCS), however, there are no studies on the effects of t‐ACCF and ODLP on the occipito‐atlantoaxial complex. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the changes in sagittal parameters and range of motion (ROM) of the occipito‐atlantoaxial complex in OPLL patients treated with t‐ACCF and ODLP. Methods This was a retrospective study that included 74 patients who underwent t‐ACCF or ODLP for the treatment of OPLL from January 2012 to August 2022 at our institution. Preoperative, 3‐month, and 1‐year postoperative cervical neutral, flexion‐extension, and lateral flexion radiographs were taken. Sagittal parameters including Cobb angle of C2‐7, C0‐2, C0‐1, C1‐2, C2 slope, and the ROM were measured. The clinical outcome was assessed using the JOA, VAS, and NDI scores preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Multiple linear regression was employed to identify factors influencing changes in UCS. Results In the ODLP group, the SCS (C2‐7) Cobb angle was significantly reduced (12.85 ± 10.0 to 7.68 ± 11.27; p
orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?