The CT Classification of Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament to Guide Hybrid Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion vs. Posterior Laminoplasty
Shunmin Wang,Haibo Song,Ximing Xu,Shiyong Ling,Yuan Wang,Jingchuan Sun,Jiangang Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14088
2024-05-23
Orthopaedic Surgery
Abstract:The ossification passes through the posterior edge of the C2 vertebral body and all the C3 vertebral bodies, the center of the C4 vertebral body, the lower edge of the C5 vertebral body, the upper edge of the C6 vertebral body, and the C5/6 and C6/7 intervertebral spaces. Therefore, C2 chooses shelter, C3 and C4 choose lifting, C5/6 chooses TSD, C6/7 chooses ACDF, and HACAF removes the operable ossification, and lifts the vertebral body that retains the ossification. Objective For precise and minimally invasive treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine, the lifting segment is minimized, anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) was refined and improved. In addition, the development of appropriate surgical procedures for the ossification of each segment was rarely reported. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of hybrid anterior controlled antedisplacement fusion (Hybrid ACAF) with laminoplasty for multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Methods Between May 2018 and May 2021, 70 patients with multilevel OPLL were divided into a hybrid ACAF group and a laminoplasty group according to surgical methods. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and recovery rate (JOARR), (VAS, NDI) score and C2–C7 Cobb angle, the sagittal vertical axis of the neck (SVA), and complications (cerebrospinal fluid leakage, C5 paralysis, etc.) were compared between the two groups by t test or non‐parametric test. Results The operation time of hybrid ACAF was longer. C5 paralysis and axial pain were more common in the laminoplasty group, while dysphagia and hoarseness were more common in the hybrid ACAF group. At the last follow‐up, the hybrid ACAF group had better recovery and maintenance of cervical lordosis and sagittal plane balance and a higher JOA score and recovery rate than the laminoplasty group. Conclusions Hybrid ACAF can reduce the number of vertebral bodies and expand the decompression range, which is safe, effective, and tailored to local conditions. Compared with laminoplasty, hybrid ACAF is a precise alternative for patients with OPLL.
orthopedics