Human losses due to climate-related disasters: an urgent call for quality control

Markus Enenkel,Debarati Guha-Sapir,Benjamin F Zaitchik
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad58fb
IF: 6.7
2024-06-19
Environmental Research Letters
Abstract:Missing data in climate impact databases are a source of major bias in disaster impact analyses and can mislead policy making. EMDAT, an international reference data source on disaster impacts, is often used without much quality control or consideration of data gaps. Ignoring these gaps undermines both the evaluation of disaster risk management activities and the evidence base for global policies for early warnings and disaster risk reduction. EMDAT, considered a key data source on climate extremes and their human impacts, records casualty information for only one in three climatological disasters. In this study, we provide insights into the missing data, highlighting the importance of data quality control to account for bias. Understanding where and why data is missing provides insights into whether trends can be attributed to true progress in disaster risk reduction or are merely statistical artifacts. We also underline the pressing need for harmonization across other databases that are relevant for measuring the human impact of climate disasters and suggest new technologies to fill gaps. As major resource investments were requested during COP 28 (2023) to attenuate the impact of future disasters, more complete and convincing data on climate disasters and human impacts will be needed to better identify the efficiency of countermeasures.
environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?