The Need for Climate Data Stewardship: 10 Tensions and Reflections regarding Climate Data Governance

Stefaan Verhulst

2024-03-27

Abstract:Datafication -- the increase in data generation and advancements in data analysis -- offers new possibilities for governing and tackling worldwide challenges such as climate change. However, employing new data sources in policymaking carries various risks, such as exacerbating inequalities, introducing biases, and creating gaps in access. This paper articulates ten core tensions related to climate data and its implications for climate data governance, ranging from the diversity of data sources and stakeholders to issues of quality, access, and the balancing act between local needs and global imperatives. Through examining these tensions, the article advocates for a paradigm shift towards multi-stakeholder governance, data stewardship, and equitable data practices to harness the potential of climate data for public good. It underscores the critical role of data stewards in navigating these challenges, fostering a responsible data ecology, and ultimately contributing to a more sustainable and just approach to climate action and broader social issues.

Computers and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the following issues:

1. **Data Diversity and Stakeholders**: Climate data comes from diverse sources and involves various stakeholders, leading to complexity and conflicts within the data ecosystem. The paper explores how multi-party governance, data management, and equitable data practices can address these challenges.

2. **Competing Priorities and Lack of Common Principles**: Different stakeholders in the climate data field (such as climate change activists and the private sector) have varying priorities and principles. There is a need to establish a common normative and ethical framework to guide the collection, processing, and use of climate data.

3. **Power Imbalance**: Decision-making power regarding data collection, analysis, and sharing is concentrated in the hands of a few, which can exacerbate inequalities. The paper discusses how multi-stakeholder governance can address this issue.

4. **Data Extraction and Collective Rights**: Data ownership can lead to the exploitation of data from specific communities, especially across national and cultural boundaries. It is essential to ensure that data collection and use do not exacerbate existing socio-economic disparities.

5. **Data Quality, Traceability, and Standards**: As the volume of data grows, the quality and integrity of data become increasingly important. The paper emphasizes the importance of establishing data standards to promote interoperability and responsible reuse.

6. **Timeliness, Continuity, and Sustainability**: Ensuring the timely collection and release of climate data is crucial for effective risk management. However, financial sustainability is a major obstacle to achieving this goal.

7. **Access, Openness, and Transparency**: Simply opening data does not guarantee transparency. The paper proposes methods to enhance transparency through improved data collaboration, empowering data stewards, and better data-sharing practices.

8. **Bias, Interest Capture, and Whitewashing**: Bias in data and algorithms is a serious issue, especially in the context of the growing importance of artificial intelligence. Additionally, there are risks of data collection being obscured or academic research being controlled by the private sector. The paper suggests addressing these issues through technical and policy measures.

9. **Local and Global Perspectives**: While climate change is a global issue, specific solutions may need to consider local differences. The paper explores how to balance local needs with global responsibilities.

10. **Dispute Resolution and Accountability**: Disputes are inevitable in the use of data, requiring flexible and independent resolution mechanisms. Additionally, accountability is a crucial component of ensuring climate justice.

In summary, the paper aims to promote a paradigm shift in climate data governance by addressing these ten core contradictions and their solutions, thereby better utilizing climate data to serve the public interest.