Abstract:Introduction: This paper presents a Four Question Framework to guide data integration partners in building a strong governance and legal foundation to support ethical data use. Objectives: While this framework was developed based on work in the United States that routinely integrates public data, it is meant to be a simple, digestible tool that can be adapted to any context. Methods: The framework was developed through a series of public deliberation workgroups and 15 years of field experience working with a diversity of data integration efforts across the United States. Results: The Four Questions-Is this legal? Is this ethical? Is this a good idea? How do we know (and who decides)?-should be considered within an established data governance framework and alongside core partners to determine whether and how to move forward when building an Integrated Data System (IDS) and also at each stage of a specific data project. We discuss these questions in depth, with a particular focus on the role of governance in establishing legal and ethical data use. In addition, we provide example data governance structures from two IDS sites and hypothetical scenarios that illustrate key considerations for the Four Question Framework. Conclusions: A robust governance process is essential for determining whether data sharing and integration is legal, ethical, and a good idea within the local context. This process is iterative and as relational as it is technical, which means authentic collaboration across partners should be prioritized at each stage of a data use project. The Four Questions serve as a guide for determining whether to undertake data sharing and integration and should be regularly revisited throughout the life of a project. Highlights: Strong data governance has five qualities: it is purpose-, value-, and principle-driven; strategically located; collaborative; iterative; and transparent.Through a series of public deliberation workgroups and 15 years of field experience, we developed a Four Question Framework to determine whether and how to move forward with building an IDS and at each stage of a data sharing and integration project.The Four Questions-Is this legal? Is this ethical? Is this a good idea? How do we know (and who decides)?-should be carefully considered within established data governance processes and among core partners.

Future directions for scholarship on data governance, digital innovation, and grand challenges

Data Science for Social Good

Social data governance: From reflective practices to comparative synthesis

Building better global data governance

The political economy of digital data: introduction to the special issue

Data governance in smart cities: Challenges and solution directions

Data sustainability: Data governance in data infrastructures across technological and human generations

Software-Defined Infrastructure For Decentralized Data Lifecycle Governance: Principled Design And Open Challenges

The Governance of Digital Technology, Big Data, and the Internet: New Roles and Responsibilities for Business

Social data governance: Towards a definition and model

Exploring the Evolving Dynamics of Data Privacy, Ethical Considerations, and Data Protection in the Digital Era

We need to think about data governance for dementia research in a digital era

Multi-scale governance and data for sustainable development

Data Governance and Stewardship: Designing Data Stewardship Entities and Advancing Data Access

Towards Data Governance of Frontier AI Models

Big Data: Opportunities and Privacy Challenges

Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence

Four questions to guide decision-making for data sharing and integration

Security implications of digitalization: The dangers of data colonialism and the way towards sustainable and sovereign management of environmental data

The future of data ownership: An uncommon research agenda

How to use relevant data for maximal benefit with minimal risk: digital health data governance to protect vulnerable populations in low-income and middle-income countries