Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the results of cataract surgery in myopia patients after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and to compare the predictability of various methods of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation.METHOD:Seventeen cases (24 eyes) who had LASIK for myopia were divided into two group by with or without history of corneal power data. Corneal power was obtained by autokeratometry, corneal topography, Pentacam and IOL Master. The IOL power was calculated with the clinical history method, Feiz-Mannis formula, Feiz-Mannis method and other methods. Postoperative final refraction and the deviation of the final spherical equivalent (SEQ) from the refractive target were measured 3 month after the surgery. Two sample t-test, linear correlation and regression analysis, paired t-test and Bland-Altman method of agreement were used to analyze these data.RESULTS:In the group with history data, the mean corneal power was (43.28 ± 1.21) D and the mean SEQ was (-15.33 ± 4.36) D before the LASIK surgery. In the group without history data, the mean SEQ was (-10.11 ± 3.12) D. Before cataract surgery, the mean corneal power was (36.96 ± 2.07) D and (36.85 ± 1.40) D in these two groups. The mean arithmetic refractive prediction error after cataract surgery was (-0.66 ± 1.27) D and (-0.47 ± 0.82) D in these two groups, respectively. Data calculated by using Hamed-Wang-Koch method, Masket Formula, Koch/Maloney method, Shammar method and Pentacam ERK method were lower than the emmetropic IOL power. Data calculated by using Feiz-Mannis Formula, Latkany Method, Savini method, Armberri Double K method were overestimated. The mean arithmetic errors of clinic history method, Corneal Passby Method and Haigis-L Formula were not significantly different from the predict refraction (P = 0.364, 0.318 and 0.069; t = 0.956, -1.057 and -1.911, respectively). There was strong correlation between the value calculated by using Feiz-Mannis Method or Haigis-L Formula and the true power (r = 0.921, 0.915; P = 0.000 and 0.000, respectively). But none of the values calculated by these method could fully agree with the true value.CONCLUSIONS:IOL power should be calculated accurately to avoid undercorrection. We recommend the combination of clinical history method, Feiz-Mannis Method, Corneal Passby Method and Haigis-L Formula for the calculation of IOL power.

Comparison of Different Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Eyes With Primary Angle Closure

Comparison of two formulas for calculating intraocular lens in patients with angle-closure glaucoma

Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with a history of acute primary angle-closure attack

Effect of Intraocular Lens Biomaterials on the Treatment of Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma

A five year follow up survery of primary angle closure suspect

A systemic review and network meta-analysis of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in primary angle-closure conditions

The Effects of Lens Extraction Surgery on Intraocular Pressure and Anterior Segment Parameters in Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma

Changes in Iridotrabecular Contact and Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification in Primary Angle-Closure Disease Spectrum

Influence of miosis and laser peripheral iridotomy on intraocular lens power calculation in patients with primary angle closure disease

Error Sources and Correction of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation after Corneal Refractive Surgery

Direct observation and measurement of circumlental space and its relation to anterior chamber angle characteristics in iridotomized phakic eyes with primary angle closure disease

Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma: What We Know and What We Don't Know.

Differences and Similarities Between Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma

Comparison of intraocular pressure and anterior segment parameters in subjects with asymmetrical primary angle closure disease

Anterior Chamber Angle and Intraocular Pressure Control After Phacoemulsification in Primary Angle Closure with Different Mechanisms

[Rational application of lens extraction for primary angle-closure glaucoma].

Assessing the clinical efficacy of phacoemulsification cataract extraction in treating acute primary angle closure and fellow primary angle closure suspect eyes using AS-OCT

Anterior Chamber Angle Assessment by Anterior-Segment Optical Coherence Tomography after Phacoemulsification with or Without Goniosynechialysis in Patients with Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma

Clinical Study on the Management of Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma with Cataract by Phacoemulsification Combined with Goniosynechialysis

Differences Between Fellow Eyes of Acute and Chronic Primary Angle Closure (glaucoma): an Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Quantitative Study

[Clinical Study of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Methods after Cornea Refractive Surgery].