Milestones in Surgical Complication Reporting. Clavien-Dindo Classification 20 Years & Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) 10 Years
Fariba Abbassi,Matthias Pfister,Katharina L Lucas,Anja Domenghino,Milo A Puhan,Pierre-Alain Clavien,Outcome Reporting Group,Mustapha Adham,Luca Aldrighetti,Deniz Balci,Andrea Belli,Giulio Belli,Frederik Berrevoet,Dominique L Birrer,Ugo Boggi,Luigi Bonavina,Inne Hm Borel-Rinkes,Eva Breuer,Christiane J Bruns,Marco Bueter,Olivier R Busch,Matteo Cescon,William C Chapman,Sean P Cleary,Alessandra Cristaudi,Xabier de Aretxabala,Eduardo de Santibañes,Roland P DeMatteo,Tomoki Ebata,Dilmurodjon Eshmuminov,Alberto R Ferreres,Andrea Frilling,David Fuks,David Geller,Daniel Gero,Michael Gnant,Georg Györi,Dieter Hahnloser,Jacob F Hamming,Ho-Seong Han,Kiyoshi Hasegawa,Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro,Arnulf Hoelscher,Eve Hopping,Povilas Ignatavicius,Koo J Kang,Norihiro Kokudo,Marek Krawczyk,Christoph Kuemmerli,Jan Lerut,Mickaël Lesurtel,J Peter A Lodge,Pietro Majno-Hurst,Lucas McCormack,Miguel A Mercado,Marco Montorsi,Markus K Muller,Philip C Müller,Xavier Muller,Masato Nagino,Takehiro Noji,Christian E Oberkofler,Robert T Padbury,Yann Parc,Joon S Park,Timothy M Pawlik,Juan Pekolj,Andrea Peloso,Antonio D Pinna,Wojciech G Polak,Andreas Prachalias,Jose M Ramia,Michaela Ramser,Dimitri A Raptis,Jean-Marc Regimbeau,Mohamed Rela,Ricardo Robles-Campos,Patricia Sánchez-Velázquez,Moritz Schmelzle,Marcel A Schneider,Wolfgang Schroeder,Markus Selzner,Gregory Sergeant,Shimul A Shah,Ksenija Slankamenac,Roxane D Staiger,Thomas Steffen,Ignazio Tarantino,Christian Toso,Stéphanie Truant,Christoph Tschuor,Kristjan Ukegjini,Jean N Vauthey,Steven D Wexner,Desmond C Winter,Alexandra M Zaborowski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006471
2024-08-05
Abstract:Objective: To provide improved guidance for the consistent application of the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) in challenging clinical scenarios. Background: Standardized outcome reporting is key for proper assessment of surgical procedures. A recent consensus conference recommended the CDC and the CCI® for assessing postoperative morbidity. Several challenging scenarios for grading complications still require evidence-based guidance, and the use of the two metrics in RCTs remains unexplored. Methods: We assessed the use of the CDC and CCI® as an outcome measure in a systematic literature search. Additionally, we asked 163 international surgeons to critically evaluate and independently grade complications in 20 complex clinical scenarios. Finally, a core group of five experts used this information to develop consistent recommendations. Results: Until July 2023, 1327 RCTs selected the CDC and/or CCI® to assess morbidity. Annual use was steadily increasing with now over 200 new RCTs per year. However, only a third (n=335) of published RCTs provided the complete range of CDC grades, including all subgrades. Eighty-nine out of 163 surgeons (response rate 55%) completed the questionnaire that served as basis for the recommendations: Repetitive interventions that are required to treat one complication, complications followed by further complications, complications occurring prior to referral, and expected and unrelated complications to the original procedure should all be counted separately and included in the CCI®. Invasive blank diagnostic interventions should not be considered a complication. Conclusion: The increasing use of the CDC and CCI® in RCTs highlights the importance of their standardized application. The current consensus on various difficult scenarios may offer novel guidance for the consistent use of the CDC and CCI®, aiming to improve complication reporting, and better-quality control, ultimately benefiting all healthcare stakeholders, and first and foremost, all patients.