Milestones in Surgical Complication Reporting – Twenty years of Clavien-Dindo Classification & ten years of Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®)

F Abbassi,M Pfister,A Domenghino,K L Lucas,M A Puhan,P A Clavien

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae118.052

2024-05-01

Abstract:Abstract Background Standardized outcome reporting is key for proper assessment of surgical procedures. A recent consensus conference recommended the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) for assessing postoperative morbidity. However, their use in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has not been assessed, and several challenging scenarios for grading complications require consensus-based guidance. Aims The aim of this study was to assess the use of the CDC and CCI® in RCTs and to provide guidance on their standardized and consistent application. Methods We identified all RCTs that used the CDC or CCI® as a primary or secondary outcome. In addition, we asked 163 international surgeons to independently grade complications of 20 clinical cases covering seven challenging scenarios. Finally, a core group of five experts used this information do develop consistent recommendations. Results Up to July 2023, 1424 RCTs used the CDC or CCI® to assess postoperative morbidity. Annual use was steadily increasing with now over 200 new RCTs per year. Eighty-nine (55%) surgeons completed the survey. Complications requiring multiple interventions, complications of complications, complications occurring prior to referral, and expected and unrelated complications should all be counted as separate complications and included in the CCI®. Invasive diagnostics without findings should not be considered as a complication since purely diagnostic. Conclusion We observed an extensive and steadily increasing use of CDC and CCI® in RCTs, highlighting the importance of their consistent application. Provided by the original developers of the CDC and CCI® and based on an international survey of their frequent users, the current consensus offers much-needed guidance for challenging scenarios. This will further improve the consistency and accuracy of complication reporting, leading to higher quality RCTs, improved cost estimations, and better quality control, ultimately benefiting all stakeholders.