Influence of social determinants of health and adversity on computerized neurocognitive assessment
Jillian Lemke Alena Sorensen D'Alessio Farren B.S. Briggs Christopher Bailey a Neurological Institute,University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center,Cleveland,OH,USAb Department of Epidemiology,Gillings School of Public Health,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,Chapel Hill,NC,USAc Department of Public Health Sciences,Division of Epidemiology,Miller School of Medicine,University of Miami,Miami,FL,USAd Department of Neurology,Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine,Neurological Institute,University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center,Cleveland,OH,USA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2375801
2024-07-13
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Abstract:Introduction: Social determinants of health and adversity, including poverty, maltreatment, and neighborhood deprivation, are individual-level factors that may significantly affect baseline neurocognitive testing and management that have yet to be thoroughly explored within the computerized neurocognitive assessment. Objectives: Examine individual-level experiences of poverty, abuse, neighborhood deprivation, and social mobility on computerized cognitive testing. Methods: The sample included 3,845 student-athletes who completed a baseline Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) and were enrolled in the Child-Household Integrated Longitudinal Data database. Multivariable linear regressions were used to assess independent variables of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program enrollment, abuse or neglect cases, Area Deprivation Index scores, and other demographic factors on four baseline ImPACT composite scores: verbal and visual memory, visuomotor, and reaction time. Results: Individual-level factors of persistent poverty and neighborhood deprivation were associated with lower composite scores; however, upward social mobility was not significantly associated with cognitive performance. The effects of mother's race on computerized cognitive testing performance were attenuated when accounting for measures of adversity. Conclusion: Findings highlight the importance of social determinants of health in computerized neurocognitive testing to ensure more culturally sensitive and precise understanding of athletic baselines.
psychology, clinical,clinical neurology