Abstract:Abstract Originally, an infill well from project H was approved in 2013 to be completed as a single zone Open Hole Gravel Pack (OHGP) to produce gas commingled from three sands located at the shallowest reservoir in that field. Interpretation of recent logs from a nearby producing well indicated that there was significant water threat at two of the sands which would lead to water influx from the beginning of production if the well was to be completed as a single zone OHGP. The well was then redesigned to be completed as a Cased Hole Gravel Pack (CHGP) in order to have mechanical isolation from the water zones with an inner string and internal isolation packers to allow feasibility of zonal isolation to shut off the water producing zone in the future. This feature however resulted in higher well cost as compared to the approved design. Due to recent hostile low oil price, a more cost-effective sand control design was evaluated to reduce the well cost while maintaining similar performances as a CHGP design in terms of the capability to delay water breakthrough. Design feasibility study was performed on multizone OHGP with open hole mechanical packer and an inner string design to evaluate its performance and magnitude of cost reduction relative to a CHGP design. Skin analysis was performed for both OHGP and CHGP completion designs to evaluate any additional pressure loss for each sand. Prior to compartment optimization, an OHGP completion without packer placement was simulated in a dynamic simulation to generate the production profile as a base case. This was followed by a compartment optimization that was performed with OH mechanical packer placement at various standoff distances from the Gas-Water Contact (GWC) such as 5ft, 10ft, 15ft, 20ft and 30ft respectively. Subsequently, similar analysis was then performed on the CHGP completion design with a higher skin value estimated for the CHGP completion to reflect a higher degree of damage resulting from the cementing and perforation operations. Several production sensitivities were simulated by varying the perforation length and standoff from the GWC to replicate the same scenario of the open hole mechanical packer placement in the OHGP design analysis. Finally, analysis on the effectiveness of the base case (OHGP with no packer) against the cases of OHGP with optimum packer placement and CHGP with optimum perforation depth were compared and ranked over cumulative gas production, cumulative water production, operational complexity, and risk as well as total well cost. Based on the dynamic modelling, the base case (OHGP without packer) showed water breakthrough occurring right at the start of production as expected. Once breakthrough occured, water production would rapidly dominate production. On the other hand, packer placement sensitivity analysis for the OHGP design showed that the optimum depth for packer placement was 20ft or 30ft above the GWC depth where it provided highest gas cumulative and lowest water cumulative production throughout the well life. With offset distance of at least 20ft away from the GWC, the cumulative gas production for the OHGP and the CHGP cases were found to be similar and the cumulative water production for the OHGP case was slightly lower than the CHGP case. Mechanical open hole packer was recommended instead of swell packer after considering the risk of inadequate isolation by swellable packer that would lead to early water breakthrough which would subsequently reduce the cumulative gas production. As a result, an OHGP with open hole mechanical packer and inner string was selected to be the most optimum design for this well with estimated cost reduction of nearly 13% from a CHGP design. In general, an OHGP with OH mechanical packer at 20ft or 30ft standoff from the GWC brought benefit to the infill well in terms of cumulative gas production gain and low water production while eliminating sand production.

Gas–Water–Sand Inflow Patterns and Completion Optimization in Hydrate Wells with Different Sand Control Completions

A Solution to Sand Production from Natural Gas Hydrate Deposits with Radial Wells: Combined Gravel Packing and Sand Screen

Experimental study on optimization of sand control scheme in deep-water gas field

Optimization and analysis of gravel packing parameters in horizontal wells for natural gas hydrate production

STUDY ON SAND PRODUCTION IN A NATURAL GAS HYDRATE PRODUCTION WELL

Hydrate-induced clogging of sand-control screen and its implication on hydrate production operation

Protocol for sand control screen design of production wells for clayey silt hydrate reservoirs: A case study

Experimental study of gas-liquid-sand production behaviors during gas hydrates dissociation with sand control screen

Smart standalone screen completion strategy for sand control by balancing fluid influx: A review on sand retention for screen selection, acoustic sand leak detection and sand removal methods from subsurface to surface

Application and Study of Fine-Silty Sand Control Technique for Unconsolidation Quaternary Sand Gas Reservoir, Sebei Qinghai

Friction calculation and packing effect analysis for gravel packing in deepwater horizontal wells

Micromechanism of Sand Production in the Process of Hydrate Exploitation on Depressurization in Sandy Reservoirs: A Coupled Fluid-Solid Modeling

Experimental Study of Sand Migration under Distinct Sand Control Methods during Gas Hydrate Decomposition by Depressurization

Hydrate Reservoir Stimulation and Sand Control by Liquid-Solid Phase Change Proppant Filled in Radial Well

Microcosmic retaining mechanism and behavior of screen media with highly argillaceous fine sand from natural gas hydrate reservoir

Experimental Research on Gradient Sand Control in the Exploitation of a Natural Gas Hydrate Reservoir

Experimental Study on the Transport Behavior of Micron-Sized Sand Particles in a Wellbore

Sand Production Management during Marine Natural Gas Hydrate Exploitation: Review and an Innovative Solution

Lab Experiments for Abrasive Waterjet Perforation and Fracturing in Offshore Unconsolidated Sandstones

Single- and Two-Phase Fluid Using a Device for Observation at the Pore Scale

Open Hole Gravel Pack with Mechanical Open Hole Isolation Packer: Cost Effective Alternative Solution for Water Influx Deferments in Sand Prone Multizone Gas Well