Experimental comparison of First-law analysis of peak hour operation of GSHP system under optimized conditions

Shammy Kumar Sah,Krishnan Murugesan,Elangovan Rajasekar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124525
IF: 6.4
2024-10-07
Applied Thermal Engineering
Abstract:The present study presents a novel procedure to study energy – efficient performance of a Ground − Source Heat Pump (GSHP) system during peak hour space cooling and heating operations by integrating an experimental study with First law analysis and optimization techniques. The main objective of the study is to identify how closely the results of First law analysis agree with the actual experimental results when operated under optimized conditions. The experimental data obtained during peak hour operation of a 17.58 kW GSHP system for each three days of operation in summer and winter seasons are considered for the analysis. The Coefficient of Performance (COP) and Power Consumption (W) of the GSHP system are computed using an energy balance based on First law using the experimentally measured heat rejection by the Borehole Heat Exchangers (BHEs) and the cooling effect. For optimization using the Taguchi method, six distinct measured parameters, each at three different levels, are selected as variables. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was carried out on COP and W to ascertain the parameters that exert the most significant influence on the performance of the GSHP system. During peak hour operation, the temperature difference between the inlet and outlet water in the BHE was found to be 10–11 °C in cooling mode and 3 °C to 4 °C in heating mode operations. Temperatures of water in the BHEs and air at the heat pump, which contribute to the heat interaction, are found to be the most influential parameters for cooling and heating mode operations. The COP for cooling mode computed by the optimization technique, 3.59, closely agrees with the experimental COP of 3.73. Similarly, the optimized COP for heating mode, 3.84 is found to be closer to the experimental COP of 4.32. The optimized power consumption deviates by 14.21 % and 11.94 % from the experimental results for cooling and heating modes, respectively.
energy & fuels,engineering, mechanical,thermodynamics,mechanics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?