Abstract:Escherichia coli chemotactic motion in spatiotemporally varying environments is studied by using a computational model based on a coarse-grained description of the intracellular signaling pathway dynamics. We find that the cell's chemotaxis drift velocity v(d) is a constant in an exponential attractant concentration gradient [L] proportional, variantexp(Gx). v(d) depends linearly on the exponential gradient G before it saturates when G is larger than a critical value G(C). We find that G(C) is determined by the intracellular adaptation rate k(R) with a simple scaling law: G(C) infinity k(1/2)(R). The linear dependence of v(d) on G = d(ln[L])/dx directly demonstrates E. coli's ability in sensing the derivative of the logarithmic attractant concentration. The existence of the limiting gradient G(C) and its scaling with k(R) are explained by the underlying intracellular adaptation dynamics and the flagellar motor response characteristics. For individual cells, we find that the overall average run length in an exponential gradient is longer than that in a homogeneous environment, which is caused by the constant kinase activity shift (decrease). The forward runs (up the gradient) are longer than the backward runs, as expected; and depending on the exact gradient, the (shorter) backward runs can be comparable to runs in a spatially homogeneous environment, consistent with previous experiments. In (spatial) ligand gradients that also vary in time, the chemotaxis motion is damped as the frequency omega of the time-varying spatial gradient becomes faster than a critical value omega(c), which is controlled by the cell's chemotaxis adaptation rate k(R). Finally, our model, with no adjustable parameters, agrees quantitatively with the classical capillary assay experiments where the attractant concentration changes both in space and time. Our model can thus be used to study E. coli chemotaxis behavior in arbitrary spatiotemporally varying environments. Further experiments are suggested to test some of the model predictions.

Transient drift of Escherichia coli under diffusing Step nutrient profile

Theoretical results for chemotactic response and drift of E. coli in a weak attractant gradient

Chemotaxis when Bacteria Remember: Drift versus Diffusion

Quantitative Modeling of Escherichia Coli Chemotactic Motion in Environments Varying in Space and Time

A path-integral formulation of the run and tumble motion and chemotaxis in Escherichia coli

Frequency-Dependent Escherichia Coli Chemotaxis Behavior

How the motility pattern of bacteria affects their dispersal and chemotaxis

Effect of switching time scale of receptor activity on chemotactic performance of Escherichia coli

Optimal Chemotactic Responses in Stochastic Environments

Barrier Crossing in Escherichia Coli Chemotaxis.

Physical Limits on Bacterial Navigation in Dynamic Environments

Persistence of direction increases the drift velocity of run and tumble chemotaxis

Optimal search in E.coli chemotaxis

Bacteria push the limits of chemotactic precision to navigate dynamic chemical gradients

Chemotactic drift speed for bacterial motility pattern with two alternating turning events

Migration and accumulation of bacteria with chemotaxis and chemokinesis

Enhanced chemotaxis efficiency of Escherichia coli in viscoelastic solutions

Effect of receptor clustering on chemotactic performance of Escherichia coli: sensing versus adaptation

Osmotaxis in Escherichia coli through changes in motor speed

Bacterial hopping and trapping in porous media

State of the art of bacterial chemotaxis