Abstract:Escherichia coli chemotactic motion in spatiotemporally varying environments is studied by using a computational model based on a coarse-grained description of the intracellular signaling pathway dynamics. We find that the cell's chemotaxis drift velocity v(d) is a constant in an exponential attractant concentration gradient [L] proportional, variantexp(Gx). v(d) depends linearly on the exponential gradient G before it saturates when G is larger than a critical value G(C). We find that G(C) is determined by the intracellular adaptation rate k(R) with a simple scaling law: G(C) infinity k(1/2)(R). The linear dependence of v(d) on G = d(ln[L])/dx directly demonstrates E. coli's ability in sensing the derivative of the logarithmic attractant concentration. The existence of the limiting gradient G(C) and its scaling with k(R) are explained by the underlying intracellular adaptation dynamics and the flagellar motor response characteristics. For individual cells, we find that the overall average run length in an exponential gradient is longer than that in a homogeneous environment, which is caused by the constant kinase activity shift (decrease). The forward runs (up the gradient) are longer than the backward runs, as expected; and depending on the exact gradient, the (shorter) backward runs can be comparable to runs in a spatially homogeneous environment, consistent with previous experiments. In (spatial) ligand gradients that also vary in time, the chemotaxis motion is damped as the frequency omega of the time-varying spatial gradient becomes faster than a critical value omega(c), which is controlled by the cell's chemotaxis adaptation rate k(R). Finally, our model, with no adjustable parameters, agrees quantitatively with the classical capillary assay experiments where the attractant concentration changes both in space and time. Our model can thus be used to study E. coli chemotaxis behavior in arbitrary spatiotemporally varying environments. Further experiments are suggested to test some of the model predictions.

Effect of switching time scale of receptor activity on chemotactic performance of Escherichia coli

Effect of receptor clustering on chemotactic performance of Escherichia coli: sensing versus adaptation

Quantitative Modeling of Escherichia Coli Chemotactic Motion in Environments Varying in Space and Time

Transient drift of Escherichia coli under diffusing Step nutrient profile

Frequency-Dependent Escherichia Coli Chemotaxis Behavior

The Effect of Receptor Interaction on the Bacterial Chemotactic Adaptation Rate

Theoretical results for chemotactic response and drift of E. coli in a weak attractant gradient

Relationship between cellular response and behavioral variability in bacterial chemotaxis

Chemotaxis when Bacteria Remember: Drift versus Diffusion

A path-integral formulation of the run and tumble motion and chemotaxis in Escherichia coli

Kinetic modeling of the chemotactic process in run-and-tumble bacteria

Optimal methylation noise for best chemotactic performance of {\sl E. coli}

Eukaryotic Chemotaxis under Periodic Stimulation Shows Temporal Gradient Dependence

Chemotactic Response and Adaptation Dynamics in Escherichia coli

Flagellar dynamics reveal fluctuations and kinetic limit in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis network

Run and tumble chemotaxis in a shear flow: the effect of temporal comparisons and other complications

Chemotaxis of ciliated microorganisms: with and without noise

Steady state running rate sets the speed and accuracy of accumulation of swimming bacterial populations

Persistence of direction increases the drift velocity of run and tumble chemotaxis

Chemotactic drift speed for bacterial motility pattern with two alternating turning events

Ultrasensitivity and Fluctuations in the Barkai-Leibler Model of Chemotaxis Receptors in {\it Escherichia coli}