Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to examine the differences in investors’ reactions toward firms’ corporate social responsibility (CSR)-related news announcements between individuals and institutions. Design/methodology/approach Analyzed by the short-term event study and ordinary least squares (OLS) methods using a unique CSR data set collected from newspapers in Japan from 2001 to 2016. Findings The study finds, first, the different reactions toward CSR-related news announcements among shareholders. Second, the findings indicate that individual investors are more sensitive to CSR-related positive news, whereas institutional investors are more concerned about the negative news, providing one of the reasons for mixed results in the studies on the CSR and financial performance linkage. Those findings indicate that CSR-related news affects investors’ behaviors differently based on their purpose, ability and accessible information. Practical implications This study deepens the understanding of the different investing behaviors toward CSR-related announcements by shareholder type. Second, different attitudes among investors require different investor relations (IR) approaches depending on the type. It also provides valuable implications not only for Japanese business managers or policymakers but also for those from countries with a similar stage of market maturity in the CSR context. Originality/value This paper is original in two ways. First, to the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first paper to deepen the understanding of investors’ reactions toward CSR-related events through analysis by the main shareholder, which provides some insights into mixed results in the previous studies. Second, the original CSR data set collected from newspapers by the author allows the analysis to use a larger data set than other research, resulting in more robust conclusions.

Do investors value shareholder perks? Evidence from Japan

Long-term shareholder perks and stock price reaction

Do Managers Perform for Perks?

Large Shareholder's Governance on Managerial Perk Consumption

What Drives Managerial Perks? an Empirical Test of Competing Theoretical Perspectives

Perk Consumption As A Suboptimal Outcome under Pay Regulations

Perks of Managers,Check-and-Balance of Stock Ownership and Its Economic Consequences:Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Does social trust restrain excess perk consumption? Evidence from China

Public Attention and Executive Perks: Evidence from China

Corporate reputation, shareholders’ gains, and market discounts: evidence from the private equity placement in China

Do investors’ reactions to CSR-related news communication differ by shareholder? An empirical analysis from Japan

Does Employee Stock Ownership Work? Evidence from Publicly-Traded Firms in Japan

RETAIL INVESTORS’ BIASED BELIEFS ABOUT STOCKS THAT THEY HOLD: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA’S SPLIT SHARE STRUCTURE REFORM

How Does the Stock Market Value Corporate Social Performance? When Behavioral Theories Interact with Stakeholder Theory

The valuation effect of stock dividends or splits: Evidence from a catering perspective

Individualism and excess perk consumption: Evidence from China

Parent-Subsidiary Dispersion and Executive Excess Perks Consumption

Do Chinese CEOs Consume Abnormal Perks Before Leaving Their Firms?

CEO compensation and firm performance in Japan: Evidence from new panel data on individual CEO pay

ESG reputation risks, cash holdings, and payout policies

The Negative Corporate Governance Impact of Distracted Shareholders: Evidence from Value of Cash Holdings