Abstract:PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to find out how corporate social responsibility (CSR) is viewed in the Chinese situation. The paper views CSR as an endogenous motivation for corporate social behaviour. The intended contributions of this paper are twofold. On the one hand, the authors intend to collect first‐hand data to understand the current status of Chinese managers' cognitions of CSR. On the other hand the paper intends to analyse the differences which exist in managers' cognitions on CSR among different kinds of firms in a Chinese context.Design/methodology/approachA random survey was conducted among 157 businessmen using the force‐choice questionnaire, based on the four‐part construct proposed by Carroll. The confirmatory factor analysis was utilized to test the construct validity of Carroll's conceptual model with the data sample drawn from Chinese situation. Then correlation, six pairwise t‐tests and MANOVA test were conducted for the purpose of this study.FindingsChinese managers' cognition of CSR is found to be consistent with the four‐component construct. A relatively strong preference toward economic component has been examined. The results present a significant negative correlation between economic cognition and all three of its non‐economic counterparts. No significant cognitive differences have been verified between firms with different characteristics.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper initially examined the cognition of Chinese managers toward CSR. Chinese managers are viewed as having an important role in decision making on social issues. However, how to promote the managers' cognition of CSR is needed for future research which will also examine the internal driving mechanism of CSR.Originality/valueThere has not been a great deal of empirical research done in the field of social responsibility in China. This study is a starting point for those who seek to understand the economic and sociological aspects of mainland Chinese business.

What Drives Managerial Perks? an Empirical Test of Competing Theoretical Perspectives

Do Managers Perform for Perks?

Perk Consumption As A Suboptimal Outcome under Pay Regulations

Chinese Managers' Cognition of Corporate Social Responsibility: an Empirical Investigation

Do Good Firms Necessarily Do Bad Things? Performance Aspiration, Ownership and Financial Fraud

Does social trust restrain excess perk consumption? Evidence from China

Perks of Managers,Check-and-Balance of Stock Ownership and Its Economic Consequences:Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Do Chinese CEOs Consume Abnormal Perks Before Leaving Their Firms?

Individualism and excess perk consumption: Evidence from China

Performance Goal Orientation and Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: a Moderated Mediation Model

Public Attention and Executive Perks: Evidence from China

The Motivational Antecedents and Performance Consequences of Corporate Volunteering: when Do Employees Volunteer and when Does Volunteering Help Versus Harm Work Performance?

Unethical Leader Behavior and Employee Performance: a Deontic Justice Perspective

Theorizing the relationship between discretionary employee benefits and individual performance

Excessive Incentive and Corporate Performance: Research Based on Marginal Diminishing Effect and Top Management Team of Chinese Listed Companies

Self-discipline or self-interest: CEOs' hometown identity and excess perks

Do investors value shareholder perks? Evidence from Japan

The dark side of corporate digital transformation: Evidence from excess perk consumption of executives

The Dark Side of the Chinese Stock Market: Managerial Rent-Seeking Through Equity Incentives

An Empirical Study Of The Effects Of Corporate Performance On Managerial Compensation Based On China'S Listed Companies

WHEN DOES PAY FOR PERFORMANCE MOTIVATE EMPLOYEE HELPING BEHAVIOR? THE CONTEXTUAL INFLUENCE OF PERFORMANCE SUBJECTIVITY