Abstract:Although a non-IPR fullerene cage is common for endohedral cluster fullerenes, it is very rare for conventional endofullerenes M@C2n, probably because of the minimum geometry fit effect of the endohedral single metal ion. In this work, we report on a new non-IPR endofullerene Sm@C2v(19138)-C76, including its structural and electrochemical features. A combined study of single-crystal X-ray diffraction and DFT calculations not only elucidates the non-IPR cage structure of C2v(19138)-C76 but also suggests that the endohedral Sm 2+ ion prefers to reside along the C2 cage axis and close to the fused pentagon unit in the cage framework, indicative of a significant metal−cage interaction, which alone can stabilize the non-IPR cage. Furthermore, electrochemical studies reveal the fully reversible redox behaviors and small electrochemical gap of Sm@C2v(19138)-C76, which are comparable to those of IPR species Sm@ D3h-C74. ■ INTRODUCTION Fullerene is a spherical carbon cage C2n composed of 12 pentagons and a number of hexagons (i.e., (2n − 20)/2), which increases with the cage size. The most typical fullerene C60 was discovered as early as 1985, and the followed studies unambiguously revealed its Ih symmetry as well as the significant stability in air. Noteworthy is that among the numerous C60 isomers only the Ih isomer can be obtained under ambient conditions. Structural characterization revealed that in the framework of Ih-C60 all 12 pentagons are isolated by hexagons. Later, such a topological feature has been approved to be common for all stable fullerenes and widely accepted as the isolated pentagon rule (IPR) for determining the stabilities of fullerene isomers. In contrast, the non-IPR fullerenes that violate the IPR rule were proposed to have reduced stabilities relative to those of IPR isomers due to the enhanced local strain on the fused pentagons. It was long believed that the non-IPR fullerenes had the least stabilities and could not survive in air. However, in recent years, a number of non-IPR fullerenes have been emerging in the forms of fullerene derivatives (i.e., C2nClx, C64H4), 6 endohedrals, or combinations. For instance, in 2000 the first non-IPR fullerene Sc3N@D3(6140)-C68 was unambiguously characterized, demonstrating the improved stability of the non-IPR cage in the presence of endohedral metallic cluster. In fact, a huge number of non-IPR fullerenes are found to be available in topology, which challenges researchers to search for those that can survive in air. To date, more than 20 non-IPR endohedral metallofullerenes (EMFs) have been isolated and characterized by means of NMR, single-crystal XRD, or a combination. In most cases, the non-IPR cage is stabilized by a metallic cluster (i.e., M3N, M2, Sc2S; M = group 2 and 3 elements and most lanthanides). Echegoyen et al. recently proposed that not only the electron transfer between the cluster and the cage but also the geometry fit effect of the endohedral cluster contributes to the stabilization of the non-IPR cage. However, as for conventional EMF M@C2n, a non-IPR cage is very rare, probably because of the minimum geometry fit effect of the endohedral single metal ion. In particular, a non-IPR isomer La@C72 was identified in the form of La@C2(10612)-C72(C6H3Cl2). 8 It appears that both the endohedral La ion and the exohedral derivatization contribute to the cage stabilization. Besides, other non-IPR M@C2n, including Ca@C2(10612)-C72 11 and M@C76 Received: December 5, 2014 Published: March 17, 2015 Article

Overlooked Effects of La-4f Orbitals in Endohedral Metallofullerenes

Advancements in endohedral metallofullerenes: novel metal-cage interactions driving new phenomena and emerging applications

La2@Cs(17 490)‐C76: A New Non‐IPR Dimetallic Metallofullerene Featuring Unexpectedly Weak Metal–Pentalene Interactions

Structures and Properties of Endohedral Metallofullerenes

Electron Transfer And Localization In Endohedral Metallofullerenes: Ab Initio Density Functional Theory Calculations

Deciphering the Role of Long-Range Interaction in Endohedral Metallofullerenes: A Revisit to Sc2C70

Theoretical Insight Into The Ambiguous Endohedral Metallofullerene Er3c74: Covalent Interactions Among Three Lanthanide Atoms

Encapsulation of a Large La 2 C 2 Cluster : The Importance of Cluster − Cage Matching

Element effects in endohedral metal–metal-bonding fullerenes M2@C82 (M = Sc, Y, La, Lu)

C 76 : A Non-IPR Cage Stabilized by a Divalent Metal

Computational understanding of the structural characteristics of Sm-based endohedral metallofullerenes

Surface modification induced shielding effects on electron orbital coupling in metallofullerene.

Stabilization Of Giant Fullerenes C-2(41)-C-90, D-3(85)-C-92, C-1(132)-C-94, C-2(157)-C-96, And C-1(175)-C-98 By Encapsulation Of A Large La2c2 Cluster: The Importance Of Cluster-Cage Matching

Electrode-Supported Endohedral Metallofullerenes: Insights into the Confined Internal Dynamics

C 74 endohedral metallofullerenes violating the isolated pentagon rule: A density functional theory study

When Metal Clusters Meet Carbon Cages: Endohedral Clusterfullerenes.

Electrochemical survey: the effect of the cage size and structure on the electronic structures of a series of ytterbium metallofullerenes

Theoretical Study on the Stabilities, Electronic Structures, and Reaction and Formation Mechanisms of Fullerenes and Endohedral Metallofullerenes

How to Stabilize a Heptagon-Containing C80 Cage by Endohedral Derivation

Warning to Theoretical Structure Elucidation of Endohedral Metallofullerenes

Geometries, Electronic Structures, Bonding Properties, and Stability Strategy of Endohedral Metallofullerenes TM@C28 (TM = Sc−, Y−, La−, Ti, Zr, Hf, V+, Nb+, Ta+)