Abstract:Salivary cortisol (SC) is a measure of free cortisol and follows diurnal rhythm of serum or plasma cortisol, so it is convenient for collection noninvasively on an outpatient basis. The Endocrine Society recommends measuring MiSC concentrations as a first-line test in screening for Cushing's syndrome. To define its utility as a diagnostic test, it is important to know whether assay techniques or thresholds affect the rate of false-positive results. Revision of literature showed that there are marked differences in sensitivity and specificity, and cutoff values of SC assays. The aim of this study was to compare MiSC results obtained by available immunoassays with different analytical sensitivity (AS) in an Argentinian population, and compare by pairs of methods their Diagnostic Concordance (DC) using individual reported cutoffs (RCO). Material and methods: Salivary samples obtained at 11 PM, from 133 adults subjects (18-74 years), with no corticoid therapy (last 6 months), psychiatric medication, depression, thyroid diseases, statins administration, or smoking. MiSC (nmol/L) were measured by ECLIA Cobas Roche (RCO: 4.9; AS: 1.5); RIA Beckman Coulter (RCO: 0.8; AS: 0.8), CLIA Liaison DiaSorin (RCO: 8.0; AS: 4.4), CLIA Access Beckman Coulter (RCO: 8.3; AS: 0.3) and CLIA Immulite 1000 Siemens (modified methodic) (RCO: 5.0 own data not reported; AS: 1.0). Bland & Altman biases were calculated between methods. Results: Calculated median, range and p95 (nmoL/L) for each method were: ECLIA Cobas (n=131): 1.6 (1.5-14.5) 6.4; RIA (n=90): 1.33 (0.8-7.7) 3.6, CLIA Liaison (n=126): 4.4 (8.4-22.1) 8.2, CLIA Access (n= 125): 4.1 (0.3-28) 15.6, and CLIA Immulite1000 (n: 99): 2.5 (1.4-20) 7.6. Calculated p95 was higher than RCO in all methods, being RIA the highest. ANOVA analysis for paired samples measured by all methods showed significant (p<0.005) differences except for Access and Liaison (p=1,000). Biases (nmol/L) obtained were: Cobas vs Immulite = -1; Access vs Cobas = 3.2; Cobas vs Liaison = -2.8; Cobas vs RIA = 0.9; Access vs Immulite = 2.4; Immulite vs Liaison = -1.8; Access vs Liaison = 0.3; Access vs RIA = 4.1; Liaison vs RIA = 3.6; Immulite vs RIA = 1.9. Lowest bias found was between Access and Liaison, result coincident with ANOVA. %DC between pairs of methods using RCOs was: Cobas vs Immulite = 87%; Access vs Cobas= 84%; Cobas vs Liaison = 95%; Cobas vs RIA = 64%; Access vs Immulite = 85%; Immulite vs Liaison = 90%; Access vs Liaison = 84%; Access vs RIA= 72%; Liaison vs RIA = 63%; Immulite vs RIA = 70%. Lowest %DC was found when RIA was involved in the comparison, which could be due to its low AS and RCO that are the same. Conclusions: Differences in %DC observed could be due to not only differences between methods but differences in composition of the population studied. Validating MiSC cutoff values in individual laboratories is important for good clinical use of results in the diagnosis and follow-up of Cushing’s syndrome. Unless otherwise noted, all abstracts presented at ENDO are embargoed until the date and time of presentation. For oral presentations, the abstracts are embargoed until the session begins. Abstracts presented at a news conference are embargoed until the date and time of the news conference. The Endocrine Society reserves the right to lift the embargo on specific abstracts that are selected for promotion prior to or during ENDO.

Clinical accuracy of midnight salivary cortisol measured by automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay method in Cushing's syndrome

Reference ranges of late-night salivary cortisol and cortisone measured by LC–MS/MS and accuracy for the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome

Development of diagnostic algorithm for Cushing’s syndrome: a tertiary centre experience

Salivary cortisol as a diagnostic tool for Cushing's syndrome and adrenal insufficiency: improved screening by an automatic immunoassay

SUN-LB061 Midnight Salivary Cortisol (MiSC): Diagnostic Concordance in a Normal Sample Population Using Different Immunoassays

Clinical and biochemical data for the diagnosis of endogenous hypercortisolism: the “Cushingomic” approach

Nocturnal Salivary Cortisol Is an Accurate Non-Invasive Test to Assess Endogenous Hypercortisolism in Children with Obesity and a Clinical Phenotype Suspicious for Cushing's Syndrome

The clinical application of salivary cortisol in the diagnosis of Cushing′s syndrome

Diagnostic performance of a newly developed salivary cortisol and cortisone measurement using an LC–MS/MS method with simple and rapid sample preparation

Clinical utility of an ultrasensitive urinary free cortisol assay by tandem mass spectrometry

Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling in the differential diagnosis of adrenocorticotropin-dependent Cushing's syndrome with unknown origin

Accuracy of Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of Cushing Syndrome

Comparison of Direct and Extraction Immunoassay Methods With Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Measurement of Urinary Free Cortisol for the Diagnosis of Cushing’s Syndrome

Validation of a LC-MS/MS method for establishing reference intervals and assessing diagnostic performance of urinary free cortisol and cortisone

Diagnostic Accuracy of Morning Salivary Cortisol in the Assessment of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Recovery after Prolonged Corticosteroid Therapy in Children

Expanding the use of salivary cortisol as a non-invasive outpatient test in the dynamic evaluation of suspected adrenal insufficiency

Personalized Noninvasive Diagnostic Algorithms Based on Urinary Free Cortisol in ACTH-dependant Cushing's Syndrome

Utility of salivary cortisol and cortisone in the diagnostics of adrenal insufficiency

Investigation of Using Salivary Cortisol Test in Diagnosis of Depression

Re-evaluation of overnight low-dose dexamethasone suppression test in the diagnosis of Cushing syndrome

Toward a Diagnostic Score in Cushing's Syndrome