Abstract:A chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging (ChIA-PET) approach is used to delineate chromatin interactions mediated by RNA polymerase II in several different stem-cell populations; putative long-range promoter–enhancer interactions are inferred, indicating that linear juxtaposition does not necessarily guide enhancer target selection and prevalent cell-specific enhancer usage. Gene transcription requires dynamic chromatin connectivity between promoters bound by RNA polymerase II and their corresponding distal-acting enhancers. In this paper the authors use the ChIA-PET (chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging) approach to delineate chromatin interactions mediated by RNA polymerase II in embryonic stem cells, neural stem cells and neurosphere progenitor cells. Putative enhancer–promoter interactions can be inferred, and many enhancers associate with promoters located beyond their nearest active genes, indicating that linear juxtaposition does not necessarily guide enhancer target selection. This work illustrates the possible importance of underlying chromatin structures in nuclear function. In multicellular organisms, transcription regulation is one of the central mechanisms modelling lineage differentiation and cell-fate determination1. Transcription requires dynamic chromatin configurations between promoters and their corresponding distal regulatory elements2. It is believed that their communication occurs within large discrete foci of aggregated RNA polymerases termed transcription factories in three-dimensional nuclear space3. However, the dynamic nature of chromatin connectivity has not been characterized at the genome-wide level. Here, through a chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging approach3,4,5 using an antibody that primarily recognizes the pre-initiation complexes of RNA polymerase II6, we explore the transcriptional interactomes of three mouse cells of progressive lineage commitment, including pluripotent embryonic stem cells7, neural stem cells8 and neurosphere stem/progenitor cells9. Our global chromatin connectivity maps reveal approximately 40,000 long-range interactions, suggest precise enhancer–promoter associations and delineate cell-type-specific chromatin structures. Analysis of the complex regulatory repertoire shows that there are extensive colocalizations among promoters and distal-acting enhancers. Most of the enhancers associate with promoters located beyond their nearest active genes, indicating that the linear juxtaposition is not the only guiding principle driving enhancer target selection. Although promoter–enhancer interactions exhibit high cell-type specificity, promoters involved in interactions are found to be generally common and mostly active among different cells. Chromatin connectivity networks reveal that the pivotal genes of reprogramming functions are transcribed within physical proximity to each other in embryonic stem cells, linking chromatin architecture to coordinated gene expression. Our study sets the stage for the full-scale dissection of spatial and temporal genome structures and their roles in orchestrating development.

Transcription-coupled changes in genomic region proximities during transcriptional bursting

Power-law behavior of transcriptional bursting regulated by enhancer-promoter communication

Genomic encoding of transcriptional burst kinetics

Theoretical Principles of Enhancer-Promoter Communication in Transcriptional Bursting

Gene activity fully predicts transcriptional bursting dynamics

How Transcription Factors Binding Stimulates Transcriptional Bursting

Gene Transcription in Bursting: a Unified Mode for Realizing Accuracy and Stochasticity

3D chromatin architecture, BRD4, and Mediator have distinct roles in regulating genome-wide transcriptional bursting and gene network

Regulatory Mechanisms for Transcriptional Bursting Revealed by an Event-Based Model

Genome-wide kinetic properties of transcriptional bursting in mouse embryonic stem cells

Time will tell: comparing timescales to gain insight into transcriptional bursting

Genome-wide inference reveals that feedback regulations constrain promoter-dependent transcriptional burst kinetics

Characteristics of Promoter Architecture-Dependent Expression Noise and Bursting Kinetics

Identification of molecular determinants of gene-specific bursting patterns by high-throughput imaging screens

Transcriptional bursting dynamics in gene expression

Cohesin couples transcriptional bursting probabilities of inducible enhancers and promoters

Transcribed enhancers lead waves of coordinated transcription in transitioning mammalian cells

Dynamic modulation of enhancer‐promoter and promoter‐promoter connectivity in gene regulation

Direct observation of a condensate effect on super-enhancer controlled gene bursting

Chromatin Connectivity Maps Reveal Dynamic Promoter–enhancer Long-Range Associations