Abstract:Transcriptional regulation occurs through genomic contacts between enhancers and their cognate promoters, and most genes are transcribed in a bursty fashion. To understand the relationship between these two phenomena, we develop a general modeling framework in terms of the information transmission from upstream genomic organization to downstream transcriptional bursting. Importantly, we uncover fundamental theoretical principles of enhancer-promoter (E-P) spatial communication in the modulation of transcriptional burst size (BS) and burst frequency (BF). First, BS and BF obey their respective power-law dependences on the E-P communication strength and distinct scaling exponents. Second, the E-P spatial distance follows a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution rather than the previously assumed Gauss distribution. Third, the E-P genomic distance affects transcriptional outcomes biphasically (i.e., in an exponential decay for small E-P genomic distances but insensitively to large E-P genomic distances). Fourth, the E-P communication mainly modulates BF rather than BS. Finally, the mutual information between BS (or BF) and E-P spatial distance further reveals essential characteristics of the information transfer from the upstream to the downstream. Our predictions are experimentally verifiable, e.g., confirmed by experimental data on Drosophila . The overall analysis provides insights into the role of the E-P communication in the control of transcriptional bursting. Significance Measurement technologies of chromatin conformations and genome-wide occupancy data of architectural proteins have revealed that genome topology is tightly intertwined with gene transcription. However, a long-standing question in transcriptional regulation is how the enhancer-promoter (E-P) spatial communication impacts transcriptional bursting kinetics. To address this issue, we develop a multiscale model that couples upstream chromatin dynamics to downstream transcriptional bursting. This model not only reveals fundamental principles of E-P communication in transcriptional bursting kinetics (e.g., burst size and frequency follow their own power-law behaviors) but also provides a general modeling framework toward the 4D nucleome project. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Power-law behavior of transcriptional bursting regulated by enhancer-promoter communication

Theoretical Principles of Enhancer-Promoter Communication in Transcriptional Bursting

Regulatory Mechanisms for Transcriptional Bursting Revealed by an Event-Based Model

Gene Transcription in Bursting: a Unified Mode for Realizing Accuracy and Stochasticity

Transcription-coupled changes in genomic region proximities during transcriptional bursting

Exact burst-size distributions for gene-expression models with complex promoter structure

Genome-wide Inference Reveals That Feedback Regulations Constrain Promoter-Dependent Transcriptional Burst Kinetics

Characteristics of Promoter Architecture-Dependent Expression Noise and Bursting Kinetics

Gene activity fully predicts transcriptional bursting dynamics

Transcriptional bursting dynamics in gene expression

How Transcription Factors Binding Stimulates Transcriptional Bursting

Kinetic Characteristics of Transcriptional Bursting in a Complex Gene Model with Cyclic Promoter Structure

Genomic encoding of transcriptional burst kinetics

Time will tell: comparing timescales to gain insight into transcriptional bursting

3D chromatin architecture, BRD4, and Mediator have distinct roles in regulating genome-wide transcriptional bursting and gene network

Transcriptional bursts in a non-equilibrium model for gene regulation by supercoiling

Promoter-mediated Transcriptional Dynamics.

Diverse spatial expression patterns emerge from common transcription bursting kinetics

Feedback-induced Counterintuitive Correlations of Gene Expression Noise with Bursting Kinetics

Inferring Transcriptional Bursting Kinetics from Single-Cell Snapshot Data Using a Generalized Telegraph Model