Abstract:In order to improve the emergency management ability of urban communities in response to emergencies and reduce the losses caused by emergencies, based on the method of Cone-Analytic Network Process (Cone-ANP), a whole-process community emergency management ability evaluation method was proposed. Using around 25 evaluation indexes from six dimensions, namely infrastructure resilience, community organization resilience, risk management, emergency material support, emergency force building, and emergency literacy, this method established the dominant relationship of each index by the analysis of the cone network structure. It determined the community safety culture construction as the cone-top element, and obtained the limit weight vector of all the evaluation indexes by expert evaluation. The membership degree of each index was calculated to quantify the evaluation results of community emergency management ability. The results could provide a guidance and reference basis for community emergency management.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve
This paper aims to enhance the emergency management capabilities of urban communities in response to sudden incidents and reduce the losses caused by such events. Specifically, the paper proposes a comprehensive community emergency management capability evaluation method based on the Cone Analysis Network Process (Cone-ANP) method. By selecting approximately 25 evaluation indicators from six dimensions (infrastructure resilience, community organization resilience, risk management, emergency material support, emergency force construction, and emergency literacy), the dominant relationships between the indicators are established. This method identifies community safety culture construction as the apex element and obtains the limit weight vector of all evaluation indicators through expert assessment, calculating the membership degree of each indicator, thereby quantifying the evaluation results of community emergency management capabilities.
### Main Problem Background
With urban development, community emergency management capability has become an important indicator of the management level and social civilization degree of cities. Although China has made historic achievements in emergency management, the construction time of the emergency management system is short and the foundation is weak. Particularly in community emergency management, there are still a series of problems, such as imperfect community work mechanisms, insufficient allocation of emergency management personnel, unclear community emergency management goals, and unreasonable evaluation methods. Therefore, exploring an effective and scientific emergency response evaluation method for public health activities to enhance community emergency management capabilities is of great practical significance.
### Solution
The paper adopts a new analytical structure—the Cone Analysis Network Process (Cone-ANP), overcoming the shortcomings of traditional methods in insufficient consideration of evaluation uncertainty and unreasonable construction of emergency response capability evaluation systems. This goal is achieved through the following steps:
1. **Construction of the Evaluation Indicator System**: Starting from the four stages of community emergency prevention, emergency preparation, emergency response, and emergency recovery, six dimensions (secondary indicators) were initially screened. Through interviews with community managers, residents, merchants, and other personnel, combined with the actual situation of the community and external environmental factors, 25 tertiary indicators were finally determined.
2. **Cone-ANP Structural Analysis**: According to the dominant relationships between the indicators, the 25 cone elements are divided into apex elements and base elements, establishing a cone network analysis framework for community emergency management indicators.
3. **Weight Calculation**: Through expert judgment and the ANP method, the relative weight of each indicator is calculated, ultimately obtaining the limit ranking weight vector of each indicator.
4. **Quantitative Evaluation and Scoring**: Experts are invited to score each indicator according to quantitative scoring rules, calculate the total score of community emergency management capabilities, and classify it into four levels: excellent, good, average, or poor.
### Conclusion
Through the Cone-ANP method, the paper successfully quantifies the evaluation results of community emergency management capabilities, providing guidance and reference for community emergency management. The study finds that community safety culture construction is the most important indicator, while emergency science education activities, although having the smallest membership degree, are indispensable in daily life. Therefore, community emergency management should focus on weak links such as emergency science education activities, risk monitoring and early warning, and urban lifeline risk prevention and control construction. Further strengthening community emergency management investment and improving emergency response time will enable communities to respond calmly in the face of crises, reducing personal injuries and property losses.