Abstract:Background: Minimally invasive cardiac surgical procedures have become ubiquitous over the past decade. In many cases, these techniques have been associated with decreased morbidity, shorter length of stay, decreased pain, faster recovery, and superior cosmetic results. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes using a minimally invasive (mini-thoracotomy) versus standard (sternotomy) approach to the surgical resection of atrial masses. Methods: Analysis was based on 34 consecutive patients who underwent atrial mass resection at the New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center in New York, NY. The reference (REF) group included 18 patients who underwent excision of an atrial mass via a standard approach (sternotomy). The minimally invasive (MI) group included 16 patients who underwent excision of an atrial mass via a mini-thoracotomy. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the REF and MI groups based on demographic or preoperative characteristics. Tissue diagnosis of the masses resected included myxoma (n = 24), fibroblastoma (n = 3), B-cell lymphoma (n = 1), and other benign masses (n = 6). Cardiopulmonary bypass (70.5 versus 76.5 minutes; P = .57) and aortic cross-clamp times (32.7 versus 47.3 minutes; P = .14) did not differ significantly between the REF and MI groups, nor did intraoperative transfusion of packed red blood cells (0.35 versus 0.38 units; P = .93). As assessed by intraoperative trans-esophageal echocardiogram, there were no moderate to severe valvular abnormalities observed following chest closure. Intensive care unit length of stay (46.1 versus 26.2 hours; P = .15), overall hospital length of stay (6.39 versus 5.06 days; P= .18), and time to extubation (0.78 versus 0.44 days; P = .44) all trended toward shorter duration in the MI group compared with the REF group-although none of these differences achieved statistical significance. Postoperative transthoracic echocardiograms were obtained in 14 of 34 (41.2%) patients; none revealed any new or significant abnormalities. All patients survived to hospital discharge; one patient in the REF group expired during the follow-up period. Among the 34 patients, 26 patients (76.4%) were at least 2 years postoperative from their resection; 25 of the 26 (96.1%) were alive at 2-year follow-up, and the remaining 8 were alive at 1-year follow-up. All patients were free of recurrence at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS. Minimally invasive atrial mass excisions can be accomplished reliably without compromising complete tumor resection and without significant increases in operative times or serious adverse events. In addition, measures of recovery time in this study suggest faster recovery among the MI group, which is consistent with the proposed advantages by proponents of minimally invasive surgery.

Patient perception, satisfaction and cosmetic results of surgical atrial septal defect closure: Minithoracotomy versus sternotomy

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Recovery Between Two Open Heart Surgeries:Minimally Invasive Right Subaxillary Vertical Thoracomy and Traditional Median Sternotomy

Right anterolateral minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy in atrial septal defects closure .

Clinical Application of Minimal Invasive Closure of Atrial Septal Defect Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Quantitative Evaluation of Left and Right Ventricular Function by Serial Measuring Tei Index in Patients with Atrial Septal Defects Before and After Amplatzer Closure

Transesophageal echocardiography and fluoroscopy for percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects: A comparative study.

Experiences in Surgical Closure of Atrial Septal Defect with Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy Approach

A Study on Eccentric Occluder Via Ultra Minimal Incision of Doubly Committed Subarterial Ventricular Septal Defects

Comparing clinical course and patients out comes in patients undergoing Open surgical Versus Thoracoscopic closure of the atrial and ventricular septal defects in children

Impact of right anterolateral thoracotomy with a new approach on breast development: survey analysis of female cardiac surgery patients

Atrial Septal Defect Closure by Anterior Mini Thoracotomy with Total Peripheral Cannulation: A Step towards Establishing Mini Invasive Cardiac Surgery in a Developing Nation

Anterolateral Minithoracotomy Versus Median Sternotomy for the Treatment of Congenital Heart Defects: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Periareolar endoscopic minimally invasive cardiac surgery: postoperative scar assessment analysis

Comparison of Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes Among 3 Left Atrial Incisions: Conventional Direct, Transseptal, and Superior Septal Left Atriotomy

Patient attitudes to sternotomy and thoracotomy scars

Minimally invasive versus standard approach for excision of atrial masses

Perioperative Assessment and Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Atrial Septal Defect Closure with Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography

Mid-term outcomes of right subaxillary approach versus median sternotomy incision for ventricular septal defect with patent ductus arteriosus

Surgical Repair of Complete Atrioventricular Septal Defect in 86 Patients

Benefits Of A Right Anterolateral Minithoracotomy Rather Than A Median Sternotomy In Isolated Tricuspid Redo Procedures

Minithoracotomy vs. Conventional Mitral Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Mitral Valve Stenosis: a Single-Center Analysis of 128 Patients