Abstract:Background: Minimally invasive cardiac surgical procedures have become ubiquitous over the past decade. In many cases, these techniques have been associated with decreased morbidity, shorter length of stay, decreased pain, faster recovery, and superior cosmetic results. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes using a minimally invasive (mini-thoracotomy) versus standard (sternotomy) approach to the surgical resection of atrial masses. Methods: Analysis was based on 34 consecutive patients who underwent atrial mass resection at the New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center in New York, NY. The reference (REF) group included 18 patients who underwent excision of an atrial mass via a standard approach (sternotomy). The minimally invasive (MI) group included 16 patients who underwent excision of an atrial mass via a mini-thoracotomy. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the REF and MI groups based on demographic or preoperative characteristics. Tissue diagnosis of the masses resected included myxoma (n = 24), fibroblastoma (n = 3), B-cell lymphoma (n = 1), and other benign masses (n = 6). Cardiopulmonary bypass (70.5 versus 76.5 minutes; P = .57) and aortic cross-clamp times (32.7 versus 47.3 minutes; P = .14) did not differ significantly between the REF and MI groups, nor did intraoperative transfusion of packed red blood cells (0.35 versus 0.38 units; P = .93). As assessed by intraoperative trans-esophageal echocardiogram, there were no moderate to severe valvular abnormalities observed following chest closure. Intensive care unit length of stay (46.1 versus 26.2 hours; P = .15), overall hospital length of stay (6.39 versus 5.06 days; P= .18), and time to extubation (0.78 versus 0.44 days; P = .44) all trended toward shorter duration in the MI group compared with the REF group-although none of these differences achieved statistical significance. Postoperative transthoracic echocardiograms were obtained in 14 of 34 (41.2%) patients; none revealed any new or significant abnormalities. All patients survived to hospital discharge; one patient in the REF group expired during the follow-up period. Among the 34 patients, 26 patients (76.4%) were at least 2 years postoperative from their resection; 25 of the 26 (96.1%) were alive at 2-year follow-up, and the remaining 8 were alive at 1-year follow-up. All patients were free of recurrence at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS. Minimally invasive atrial mass excisions can be accomplished reliably without compromising complete tumor resection and without significant increases in operative times or serious adverse events. In addition, measures of recovery time in this study suggest faster recovery among the MI group, which is consistent with the proposed advantages by proponents of minimally invasive surgery.

Anterolateral Minithoracotomy Versus Median Sternotomy for the Treatment of Congenital Heart Defects: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Recovery Between Two Open Heart Surgeries:Minimally Invasive Right Subaxillary Vertical Thoracomy and Traditional Median Sternotomy

Anterolateral Minithoracotomy Versus Median Sternotomy for Mitral Valve Disease: a Meta-Analysis.

Right anterolateral minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy in atrial septal defects closure .

The Comparative Study of Right Anterolateral Minithoracotomy and Median Sternotomy in the Mitral Valve Replacement

Comparison of the treatment of pediatric congenital heart disease via lower partial median sternotomy and median sternotomy

Benefits Of A Right Anterolateral Minithoracotomy Rather Than A Median Sternotomy In Isolated Tricuspid Redo Procedures

Patient perception, satisfaction and cosmetic results of surgical atrial septal defect closure: Minithoracotomy versus sternotomy

Comparison Of The Outcomes Of Modified Artificial Chordae Technique For Mitral Regurgitation Through Right Minithoracotomy Or Median Sternotomy

Atrial Septal Defect Closure by Anterior Mini Thoracotomy with Total Peripheral Cannulation: A Step towards Establishing Mini Invasive Cardiac Surgery in a Developing Nation

A Propensity Matched Competitive Analysis

Combined Mitral And Aortic Valve Procedure Via Right Mini-Thoracotomy Versus Full Median Sternotomy Insights From A Single-Center Study Of Propensity-Matched Data

Right minithoracotomy versus conventional median sternotomy for patients undergoing mitral valve surgery and atrial fibrillation ablation with bipolar radiofrequency clamp

Early and Mid-Term Outcomes of Isolate Mitral Valve Repair Through Minimal Invasive Versus Median Sternotomy Ap-Proach: a Propensity-Matched Analysis

Standard Median Sternotomy, Right Minithoracotomy, Totally Thoracoscopic Surgery, Percutaneous Closure, and Transthoracic Closure for Atrial Septal Defects in Children

The Analysis of Anterolateral Minithoracotomy Versus Partial Upper Hemisternotomy in Minimally Invasive Dual Mitral and Aortic Valve Replacement

Reply to Arslan Et Al.

Right Anterolateral Thoracotomy: an Attractive Alternative to Repeat Sternotomy for High-Risk Patients Undergoing Reoperative Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery.

Minimally invasive versus standard approach for excision of atrial masses

Comparison of right axillary straight incision and median sternotomy in mitral valve replacement

Comparing clinical course and patients out comes in patients undergoing Open surgical Versus Thoracoscopic closure of the atrial and ventricular septal defects in children