Abstract:figure legend Just as a tuning knob provides incremental adjustability that is easily accessible and readily reversible, replication slippage at tandem‐repetitive DNA provides a practically inexhaustible supply of abundant variation with minimal cost to fitness. This is an example of a 'mutation protocol', a genetic pattern implementing a bet‐hedging strategy against the ever‐present risk posed by environmental uncertainty – a function analogous to that provided by sexual reproduction. Constraints imposed by mutation protocols minimize risk so that mutations with a reasonable probability for beneficial effect can be more freely and abundantly produced. Mutation protocols can perhaps be best understood as the product of selection at the level of populations, although gene‐level selection may be adequate. Because the universe of possible DNA sequences is inconceivably vast, organisms have evolved mechanisms for exploring DNA sequence space while substantially reducing the hazard that would otherwise accrue to any process of random, accidental mutation. One such mechanism is meiotic recombination. Although sexual reproduction imposes a seemingly paradoxical 50% cost to fitness, sex evidently prevails because this cost is outweighed by the advantage of equipping offspring with genetic variation to accommodate environmental vicissitudes. The potential adaptive utility of additional mechanisms for producing genetic variation has long been obscured by a presumption that the vast majority of mutations are deleterious. Perhaps surprisingly, the probability for adaptive variation can be increased by several mechanisms that generate mutations abundantly. Such mechanisms, here called 'mutation protocols', implement implicit 'constraints that deconstrain'. Like meiotic recombination, they produce genetic variation in forms that minimize potential for harm while providing a reasonably high probability for benefit. One example is replication slippage of simple sequence repeats (SSRs); this process yields abundant, reversible mutations, typically with small quantitative effect on phenotype. This enables SSRs to function as adjustable 'tuning knobs'. There exists a clear pathway for SSRs to be shaped through indirect selection favouring their implicit tuning‐knob protocol. Several other molecular mechanisms comprise probable components of additional mutation protocols. Biologists might plausibly regard such mechanisms of mutation not primarily as sources of deleterious genetic mistakes but also as potentially adaptive processes for 'exploring' DNA sequence space.

Mutation and evolution: Conceptual possibilities

Entangled Evolution Model: Application to Adaptive Mutation

Human gene mutation in pathology and evolution

Mutation rate variability as a driving force in adaptive evolution

Shifting gears: Thermodynamics of genetic information storage suggest stress-dependence of mutation rate, which can accelerate adaptation

A simple model describing evolution of genomic GC content with random perturbations in asexually reproducing organisms

Fate of a mutation in a fluctuating environment

A new era of mutation rate analyses: Concepts and methods

Genomic mutation rates that neutralize adaptive evolution and natural selection

experiments uncover a novel mechanism underlying mutation rate evolution in sexually reproducing populations

Modulation of Base Specific Mutation and Recombination Rates Enables Functional Adaptation within the Context of the Genetic Code

Fluctuation Theorem for the Mutation Process in in Vitro Evolution

Mutation protocols share with sexual reproduction the physiological role of producing genetic variation within 'constraints that deconstrain'

Emergent Network Structure, evolvable Robustness and non-linear Effects of Point Mutations in an Artificial Genome Model

Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana

On the feasibility of saltational evolution

The Significance of Mutations in Genomic Evolution

Evolving a favorable distribution for mutation effects

Proteins Evolution Upon Point Mutations

Embodied Computational Evolution: A Model for Investigating Randomness and the Evolution of Morphological Complexity

Mutationism, not Lamarckism, captures the novelty of CRISPR–Cas