Abstract:Purpose: Re-anastomosis after a Hartmann procedure is associated with a higher morbidity and mortality than other elective colorectal operations. The goal of this comparative study was to evaluate whether laparoscopic reversal is a justified operative approach, although the initial operation is most often an emergency laparotomy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data collected on all 70 patients who underwent laparoscopic and open reversal of a Hartmann procedure at the Department of Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, between January 1999 and December 2011. Together with general demographic data, the analysis included the indication for the initial Hartmann procedure, time to reversal, intraoperative findings, the choice of operative method, operating time, postoperative pain control, return of normal bowel function, length of hospital stay, and peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Results: In most patients, the Hartmann procedure was performed after a perforated sigmoid diverticulitis. We were not able to find any statistically significant differences with respect to gender, body mass index (BMI) and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification between the laparoscopic group (LG) (N = 24 patients) and the open group (OG) (N = 46). In the LG, patients were significantly younger (p = 0.019). The median operating time was 210 min (75-245) in the LG, which was significantly longer than in the OG (166 min; 66-230). The statistical analysis of the duration of postoperative analgesic therapy (LG 7 days; OG 12 days), return to normal diet (LG 3 days; OG 4 days), return of normal bowel function (LG 3 days; OG 4 days) and length of hospital stay (LOS) (LG 10 days; OG 15 days) detected significant differences in advantage for the LG. Unplanned return to theatre during index admission was only necessary in the OG (N = 7, 15.2 %). With a median follow-up of 8 months (range 1-20), we observed a comparable number of minor complications in both groups but a significantly higher number of major complications in the OG (N = 27, 58.7%) (p = 0.001). Conversion occurred in three cases (12.5%). There was no mortality in either of the two groups. Conclusions: This study was able to demonstrate the feasibility of the laparoscopic approach. In terms of postoperative results it should be seen as equivalent to the open procedure. However, the laparoscopic approach requires profound surgical expertise. The indication should be made after a careful risk/benefit analysis for each individual patient.

Laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure for complicated diverticulitis is associated with lower superficial surgical site infections compared to open surgery with similar other outcomes: a NSQIP-based, propensity score matched analysis

Laparoscopic Right Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis of Outcomes Compared with Conventional Open Surgery.

Comparison of two laparoscopic splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization techniques for management of portal hypertension and hypersplenism

Comparison of the risk of postoperative wound infection in patients with rectal cancer by laparoscopic versus open Hartmann's surgery

Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy vs. Hartmann's procedure for acute diverticulitis: what happens after discharge? Results of a nationwide analysis

Postoperative effects of laparoscopic Hartmann reversal: A multicenter propensity score matched study

Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Versus The Open Approach In Curative Resection Of Rectal Cancer

Single‐port laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure through the colostomy site: technical aspects and early postoperative outcomes

Laparoscopic versus open reversal of a Hartmann procedure: a single-center study

Laparoscopic Vs Open Surgical Insertion of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

Utilization and outcomes of Hartmann's procedure in emergency left colon surgery: evaluating postoperative complications and stoma reversal rates

Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for repairing colonoscopic perforation: a multicenter study

Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Has Better Outcomes Than Open Repair

Low Hartmann's procedure versus abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer, a propensity score matching cohort study

New Strategy During Complicated Open Appendectomy: Convert Open Operation to Laparoscopy

Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience

Outcomes of laparoscopic modified Cellan-Jones repair versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer at a community hospital

Lending a hand: The utility of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in diverticulitis with fistula

Risk Factors for Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Surgery: Analysis of 2138 Converted Operations in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Results of rectoanal manometry after a novel laparoscopic technique: laparoscope-assisted heart-shaped anastomosis for Hirschsprung's disease

Results of rectoanal manometry after a novel laparoscopic technique: laparoscope-assisted heart-shaped anastomosis for Hirschsprung’s disease