Abstract:Purpose: Studies reporting patient-centered outcomes, including quality of life and satisfaction, in perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) treatment are insufficient. This study was designed to assess the relative efficacy of laparoscopic repair (LR) as opposed to open surgical repair (OR) in the treatment of and its impact on quality of life. Methods: This investigation performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent treatment for PPU at a secondary care hospital between January 2017 and April 2020. Patients were categorized into 2 separate groups according to the type of surgical procedure received: LR and OR. Comparisons were made based on a variety of factors, such as demographic data, intra- and postoperative metrics, pain control, patient contentment, and quality of life indicators. Results: In the analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between the LR (n = 35) and OR (n = 62) groups (P > .05). Conversely, the rates of incisional hernia and surgical site infection were significantly greater in the OR group (P < .05). Moreover, the LR exhibited benefits such as a shorter length of hospital stay (P < .05), more rapid resumption of a normal diet, and fewer surgical site infections-factors that contributed to a lower rate of overall postoperative complications. According to the quality-of-life questionnaire, the LR group exhibited significantly greater scores for physical function, role, pain, and general health by the 30th postoperative day (P = .003, P < .001, P = .006, and P = .001, respectively), and by the 1-year follow-up, the LR group showed substantial improvements in physical function, physical role, emotional role, pain and general health (P = .047, P = .004, P = .039, P = .001, and P = .021, respectively), indicating its effectiveness in patient recovery and quality of life enhancement after surgery. Conclusion: This study showed that LR could provide certain benefits in managing PPUs, such as reduced lengths of hospital stay and lower incidences of surgical site infections. Although LR reported promising directions in patient satisfaction and quality of life indicators, the limited duration of postoperative monitoring necessitates caution in broadly applying these results.

Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Has Better Outcomes Than Open Repair

Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer: A retrospective cohort study

Meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of acute laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers

Laparoscopic repair vs open repair for perforated peptic ulcers: Quality of life assessment

Perioperative Outcomes Comparing Laparoscopic with Open Repeat Liver Resection for Post-Hepatectomy Recurrent Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Expanding Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy to Pancreatic-Head and Periampullary Malignancy: Major Findings Based on Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials

Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection of Small Bowel Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Outcomes of laparoscopic modified Cellan-Jones repair versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer at a community hospital

Laparoscopy: A Better Approach for Perforated Duodenal Ulcer

Laparoscopic Versus Open Omental Patch Repair for Early Presentation of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colonoscopic Perforation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

[Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer: early postoperative results and risk factors]

[Laparoscopic repair for perforated ulcer]

Perforated Peptic Ulcer Repair: Factors Predicting Conversion in Laparoscopy and Postoperative Septic Complications

Comparative study of transumbilical single hole and double hole laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation

Laparoscopic versus open management of duodenal perforation: a comparative study at a District General Hospital

Validity of laparoscopic surgery for lower gastrointestinal perforations

Comparison and analysis of comprehensive curative effect of gastric perforation repair by laparoscope and laparotomy operation

Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for repairing colonoscopic perforation: a multicenter study

Risk factors influencing the early outcome results after laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer and their predictive value