Insulin resistance negatively affects long-term outcome in non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disease after therapies to reduce atherosclerotic risk factors.

Y. Kitta,Takamitsu Nakamura,Manabu Uematsu,Wataru Sugamata,J. Deyama,Daisuke Fujioka,Yukio Saito,K. Kawabata,J. Obata,K. Kugiyama

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.05.006

IF: 2.974

2013-12-01

Journal of Cardiology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Has Better Outcomes Than Open Repair

Gaik S. Quah,Guy D. Eslick,Michael R. Cox

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-4047-8

2018-11-21

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract:PurposeOver the last 3 decades, laparoscopic procedures have emerged as the standard treatment for many elective and emergency surgical conditions. Despite the increased use of laparoscopic surgery, the role of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer remains controversial among general surgeons. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer.MethodsA systemic literature review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Database of all randomised controlled trials (RCT) that compared laparoscopic (LR) with open repair (OR) for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU). Data was extracted using a standardised form and subsequently analysed.ResultsThe meta-analysis using data from 7 RCT showed that LR for PPU has decreased overall post-operative morbidity (LR = 8.9% vs. OR = 17.0%) (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.79, p < 0.01), wound infections, (LR = 2.2% vs. OR = 6.3%) (OR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.5, p < 0.01) and shorter duration of hospital stay (6.6 days vs. 8.2 days, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in length of operation, leakage rate, incidence of intra-abdominal abscess, post-operative sepsis, respiratory complications, re-operation rate or mortality. There was no publication bias and the quality of the studies ranged from poor to good.ConclusionThese results demonstrate that laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer has a reduced morbidity and total hospital stay compared with open approach. There are no significant differences in mortality, post-operative sepsis, abscess and re-operation rates. LR should be the preferred treatment option for patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease.

gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery
Double muscle transfer for upper extremity reconstruction following complete avulsion of the brachial plexus.

K. Doi,N. Kuwata,K. Muramatsu,Y. Hottori,S. Kawai

IF: 1.536

1999-11-01

Hand Clinics

Abstract:Recent interest in reconstruction of the upper limb following brachial plexus injuries has focused on the restoration of prehension following complete avulsion of the brachial plexus. The authors use free muscle transfers for reconstruction of the upper limb to resolve the difficult problems in complete avulsion of the brachial plexus. This article describes the authors' updated technique--the double free muscle procedure. Reconstruction of prehension to achieve independent voluntary finger and elbow flexion and extension by the use of double free muscle and multiple nerve transfers following complete avulsion of the brachial plexus (nerve roots C5 to T1) is presented. The procedure involves transferring the first free muscle, neurotized by the spinal accessory nerve for elbow flexion and finger extension, a second free muscle transfer reinnervated by the fifth and sixth intercostal nerves for finger flexion, and neurotization of the triceps brachii via its motor nerve by the third and fourth intercostal motor nerves to extend and stabilize the elbow. Restoration of hand sensibility is obtained via the suturing of sensory rami from the intercostal nerves to the median nerve. Secondary reconstruction, including arthrodesis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb and glenohumeral joint, and tenolysis of the transferred muscle and distal tendons, improve the functional outcome. Based on the long-term result, selection of the patient, donor muscle, and donor motor nerve were indicated. Most patients were able to achieve prehensile functions such as holding a can and lifting a heavy box. This double free muscle transfer has provided prehension for patients with complete avulsion of the brachial plexus and has given them new hope to be able to use their otherwise useless limbs.
Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ke Chen,Yu Pan,Bin Zhang,Hendi Maher,Xiu-Jun Cai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.032

2018-01-01

Abstract:BACKGROUND:Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery (LPS) has been widely used in the treatment of benign and low-grade pancreatic diseases. It is necessary to expand the current knowledge on the feasibility and safety of LPS for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) by systematic reviewing the published studies and analyzing them by meta-analysis.METHODS:Original articles compared LPS with open pancreatic surgery (OPS) for PDAC, published from January 1994 to August 2017 were searched in medical databases. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), morbidity, mortality, operation time, blood loss, transfusion, hospital stay, retrieved lymph nodes (RLNs), and survival outcomes were compared.RESULTS:Fourteen studies with a total of 13174 patients (1705 in LPS and 11469 in OPS) were included for the meta-analysis. LPS showed less morbidity (RR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.66-0.92, P < .01), blood loss (WMD = -298.05 ml, 95% CI, -482.98∼-113.12 ml; P < .01), shorter hospital stay (WMD = -2.86, 95%CI, -3.85∼-1.87; P < .01), more RLNs (WMD = 1.47, 95%CI: 0.15-2.78; P = .03) and comparable POPF (RR = 1.12, 95%CI: 0.82-1.53, P = .50), operation time (WMD = 22.23 min; 95%CI: -19.56-64.01, P = .30), and 5-year overall survival (HR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.80-1.06; P = .23) compared to OPS.CONCLUSION:LPS can be performed safely in carefully selected patients with PADC and would improve the surgical outcomes. Considering the limitation of study design, the conclusions should be interpret cautiously and warrant to be confirmed by randomized controlled studies.
Outcomes of laparoscopic modified Cellan-Jones repair versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer at a community hospital

Tanya Odisho,Awni A. Shahait,Jared Sharza,Abubaker A. Ali

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09306-7

2022-05-13

Surgical Endoscopy

Abstract:IntroductionMinimally invasive or open Graham Patch repair remains the gold standard approach for management of perforated peptic ulcers (PPU). Herein, we report outcomes of laparoscopic technique and compare it with open approach at a community hospital.MethodsRetrospective observational study conducted comparing laparoscopic modified Cellan-Jones repair (mCJR) versus the standard open repair of PPU. Patients aged 18–90 years during 2016–2021 were offered either a minimally invasive or open approach depending on surgeon laparoscopic capability, and were compared in terms of demographics, co-morbidities, intra-operative details, and short-term outcomes.ResultsA total of 49 patients were included (46.9% males, mean age 52.9 years, mean BMI 25.0, ASA ≥ III 75.5%, 75.5% smokers, 26.5% current NSAIDs use, and 71.4% alcohol drinkers). Duodenum was the most common perforation site (57.1%), and majority of ulcers were 1–2 cm (72.9%). Laparoscopic approach was performed in 16 consecutive patients (32.7%) by a single surgeon, with no conversions. Preoperative characteristics were similar for both groups. Compared to open approach, laparoscopic group were taken to operation immediately (< 4 h) (87.5% vs. 15.2%, p < 0.001), had lower estimated blood loss (11.8 ml vs. 73.8 ml, p = 0.063), and longer operative time (117.1 min vs. 85.6 min, p = 0.010). Postoperatively, nasogastric tube was removed earlier in laparoscopic group (POD1-2, 87.5% vs. 24.2%, p = 0.001), with earlier resumption of diet (POD1-2, 62.6% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.002), less narcotic usage (< 3 days, 58.3% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.001), earlier return of bowel function (POD1-2, 43.8% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.003) and shorter length of stay (LOS) (3.7 days vs. 16.1 days, p < 0.001). Both in-house mortality and morbidity rates were lower in the laparoscopic group, but not statistically significant [(0% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.347) and (12.5% vs. 39.4%, p = 0.500), respectively].ConclusionLaparoscopic mCJR is a feasible method for repair of PPU, and it is associated with shorter LOS, and less narcotics usage in comparison to the open repair approach.Graphical abstract

surgery
Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer: A retrospective cohort study

Rohan Stuart Smith,Senthilkumar Rajavel Sundaramurthy,Daniel Croagh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12600

2018-05-27

Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery

Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Perforated peptic ulcer disease (PPU) is a condition subject to wide geographical variations in incidence. It remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, even in the era of Helicobacter pylori eradication and proton-pump inhibitor therapy. There is no clear consensus on whether laparoscopic or open approaches are superior, and with most studies in this area originating from Europe and Asia, Australian data addressing this issue are lacking.METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent surgery for PPU within a hospital network in Australia. Baseline variables and primary outcomes, including length of hospital stay, chest and abdominal complications, and mortality, were recorded. Secondary outcomes, including reasons for conversion, were also considered.RESULTS: In total, 109 patients underwent operations for PPU between January 2011 and December 2015. There were no significant differences with regard to baseline comorbidities. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of median length of hospital stay or rates of chest and abdominal complications, but the operative time was 28.5 min longer (P = <0.001) in the laparoscopic group than in the open group.CONCLUSION: Open operations were faster to perform than laparoscopic operations for repair of PPU. Despite increased experience treating many surgical diseases laparoscopically, this study did not find it to be superior in terms of length of hospital stay or complication rates.
A dual-population genetic algorithm for balanced exploration and exploitation

T. Park,K. Ryu

Abstract:
Laparoscopic repair vs open repair for perforated peptic ulcers: Quality of life assessment

Suleyman Caglar Ertekin,Ozhan Cetindag,Muhammer Ergenç,Cumhur Yeğen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.07.023

Abstract:Purpose: Studies reporting patient-centered outcomes, including quality of life and satisfaction, in perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) treatment are insufficient. This study was designed to assess the relative efficacy of laparoscopic repair (LR) as opposed to open surgical repair (OR) in the treatment of and its impact on quality of life. Methods: This investigation performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent treatment for PPU at a secondary care hospital between January 2017 and April 2020. Patients were categorized into 2 separate groups according to the type of surgical procedure received: LR and OR. Comparisons were made based on a variety of factors, such as demographic data, intra- and postoperative metrics, pain control, patient contentment, and quality of life indicators. Results: In the analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between the LR (n = 35) and OR (n = 62) groups (P > .05). Conversely, the rates of incisional hernia and surgical site infection were significantly greater in the OR group (P < .05). Moreover, the LR exhibited benefits such as a shorter length of hospital stay (P < .05), more rapid resumption of a normal diet, and fewer surgical site infections-factors that contributed to a lower rate of overall postoperative complications. According to the quality-of-life questionnaire, the LR group exhibited significantly greater scores for physical function, role, pain, and general health by the 30th postoperative day (P = .003, P < .001, P = .006, and P = .001, respectively), and by the 1-year follow-up, the LR group showed substantial improvements in physical function, physical role, emotional role, pain and general health (P = .047, P = .004, P = .039, P = .001, and P = .021, respectively), indicating its effectiveness in patient recovery and quality of life enhancement after surgery. Conclusion: This study showed that LR could provide certain benefits in managing PPUs, such as reduced lengths of hospital stay and lower incidences of surgical site infections. Although LR reported promising directions in patient satisfaction and quality of life indicators, the limited duration of postoperative monitoring necessitates caution in broadly applying these results.
Large deviations for stable like random walks on Z d with applications to random walks on wreath products ∗

L. Saloff‐Coste,Tianyi Zheng

Abstract:We derive Donsker-Vardhan type results for functionals of the occupation times when the underlying random walk on Z is in the domain of attraction of an operatorstable law on R. Applications to random walks on wreath products (also known as lamplighter groups) are given.
Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials

Shanjun Tan,Guohao Wu,Qiulin Zhuang,Qiulei Xi,Qingyang Meng,Yi Jiang,Yusong Han,Chao Yu,Zhen Yu,Ning Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.07.077

2016-01-01

International Journal of Surgery

Abstract:•Laparoscopic surgery is comparable with open procedure in the setting of repair for perforated peptic ulcer.•The advantages of laparoscopic surgery are lower surgical site infection rate, shorter nasogastric tube duration, and less postoperative pain.•More higher quality RCTs are still needed to further confirm this conclusion.
Laparoscopic Versus Open Omental Patch Repair for Early Presentation of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

Daniel Jin Keat Lee,MaDong Ye,Keith Haozhe Sun,Vishalkumar G Shelat,Aaryan Koura

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8605039

2016-01-01

Surgery Research and Practice

Abstract:Introduction. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between laparoscopic and open omental patch repair (LOPR versus OR) in patients with similar presentation of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU). The secondary aim was to evaluate the outcomes according to the severity of peritonitis. Methods. All patients who underwent omental patch repair at two university-affiliated institutes between January 2010 and December 2014 were reviewed. Matched cohort between LOPR and OR groups was achieved by only including patients that had ulcer perforation <2 cm in size and symptoms occurring <48 hours. Outcome measures were defined in accordance with length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and mortality. Results. 148 patients met the predefined inclusion criteria with LOPR performed in 40 patients. Outcome measures consistently support laparoscopic approach but only length of hospital stay (LOS) achieved statistical significance (LOPR 4 days versus OR 5 days, p < 0.01). In a subgroup analysis of patients with MPI score >21, LOPR is also shown to benefit, particularly resulting in significant shorter LOS (4 days versus 11 days, p < 0.01). Conclusion. LOPR offers improved short-term outcomes in patients who present within 48 hours and with perforation size <2 cm. LOPR also proved to be more beneficial in high MPI cases.
Comparative study of transumbilical single hole and double hole laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation

Chun-bo KANG,Qing-cheng MENG,Xiao-wei LI,Xu-bin LI,Qian ZHANG,Jun QU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2016.02.007

2016-01-01

Abstract:Objective To search for a better method for laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation.Methods Retrospective analyzed 37 cases underwent laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation,the transumbilical single hole group(15cases),the double holes laparoscopic group(22cases).Comparative analysis of the transumbilical single hole group and the double holes laparoscopic group of patients with operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume,postoperative fasting time,lied in bed time,hospitalization time,analgesic use.Results The operation time,postoperative exhaust time and hospitalization time of double holes laparoscopic group were significantly shorter than thoes of single port laparoscopic group(P0.05);The incision infection of double holes laparoscopic group was significantly reduced than that of single hole laparoscopic group(P0.05);The amount of intraoperative bleeding,analgesic use and the mortality rate between the two groups had no significant difference(P0.05).ConclusionDouble holes laparoscopic repair was more convenient and more safety than transumbilical single port laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation,the operation time was shorter,the incision infection rate was lower,the recovery time of intestinal peristalsis and the hospitalization time were shorter.
Risk factors influencing the early outcome results after laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer and their predictive value

Raimundas Lunevicius,Matas Morkevicius

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0569-0

Abstract:Background and aims: Clear patient selection criteria and indications for laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers are necessary. The aims of our study are to report the early outcome results after operation and to define the predictive values of risk factors influencing conversion rate and genesis of suture leakage. Patients/methods: Sixty nonrandomly selected patients operated on laparoscopically in a tertiary care academic center between October 1996 and May 2004 for perforated duodenal ulcers were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome measures included the duration of symptoms, shock, underlying medical illness, ulcer size, age, Boey score, and the collective predictive value of these variables for conversion and suture leakage rates. Results: Laparoscopic repair was completed in 46 patients (76.7%). Fourteen patients (23.3%) underwent conversion to open repair. Eight patients (13.3%) had postoperative complications. Suture leakage was confirmed in four patients (6.7%). Hospital stay was 7.8+/-5.3 days. There was no mortality. Patients with an ulcer perforation size of >8 mm had a significantly increased risk for conversion to open repair (p<0.05): positive predictive value (PPV) 75%, sensitivity 27%, specificity 98%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 85%. The significance of ulcer perforation size was confirmed by a stepwise logistic regression test (p=0.0201). All patients who developed suture leakage had acute symptoms for >9 h preoperatively (p<0.001): PPV 31%, specificity 84%, sensitivity 100%, and NPV 100%. Conversions happened with surgeons whose previous experience involved 1.8+/-2.3 cases compared to 3.9+/-2.9 cases in successful laparoscopic repair (p=0.039, t test). Conclusions: Ulcer perforation size of >8 mm is a significant risk factor influencing the conversion rate. An increase in the suture leakage rate is predicted by delayed presentation of >9 h.
Study of Risk Factors Leading to Conversion of Laparoscopic Simple Closure to Open Surgery in Perforated Peptic Ulcer

Emad Mohammed Salah,Tamer Alsaied Alnaimy,Atwa Arafat Atwa,Gamal Mohamed Osman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2023.279945

2023-01-01

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine

Abstract:Background: When compared to open surgery for perforated peptic ulcers, laparoscopic treatment has many advantages, including less pain, a quicker recovery time, and less consequences. Objective: This study aimed to assess the risk factors that lead to conversion of laparoscopic simple closure of perforated peptic ulcer to open procedure in Zagazig University Hospitals. Subjects and Methods: Our study is prospective randomized clinical trial was done in the General Surgery Department at Zagazig University Hospital on a study sample of 24 patients who visited an emergency room complaining of severe stomach discomfort and were told they had a perforated peptic ulcer. Those patients underwent laparoscopic repair at first. The steps of laparoscopic repair were performed after the perforation site was located laparoscopically, assuming that the initial diagnosis was correct. Results: Studied groups differed significantly regarding duration of perforation and its size, hospital stay and duration of operation. These variables were higher among conversion group than laparoscopic group. The average laparoscopic simple closure (LSC) conversion rate was 12.4% (range: 0% to 28.5%). The size of the perforation was the primary factor in most cases of conversion, however the location of the perforation was also a typical contributing factor. Only 4 of the total 24 instances in the research were converted, at a percentage of (16.7%). Conclusion: Laparoscopic management of perforated peptic ulcer is safe and practicable for the well-trained surgeon. It causes less pain postoperatively, and the rate of complications is less than an open approach.
Validity of laparoscopic surgery for lower gastrointestinal perforations

Kensuke Kudou,Ryoko Aoyama,Kento Ishihara,Tomohide Kawashita,Shuhei Kajiwara,Takashi Motomura,Takafumi Yukaya,Tomonori Nakanoko,Yosuke Kuroda,Masahiro Okamoto,Tadashi Koga,Yo-Ichi Yamashita,Eiji Oki,Tomoharu Yoshizumi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.13373

Abstract:Introduction: This study aimed to clarify the validity of laparoscopic surgery for lower gastrointestinal perforation by comparing the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic and open emergency surgery. Methods: We reviewed the data of patients who underwent surgery for lower gastrointestinal perforation. Patients were categorized into two groups: the laparoscopic group who underwent laparoscopic surgery, and the open group who underwent laparotomy. Clinical and operative outcomes between the two groups were evaluated. Results: A total of 219 patients were included in the study. There were 66 and 153 patients with small bowel and colorectal perforations, respectively. The median operative time in the laparoscopic group was shorter than that in the open group (126 min vs. 146 min, p = .049). The mean amount of intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (50.4 mL vs. 400.1 mL, p < .001). The incidence of postoperative complication was higher in the open group (20.0% vs. 66.5%, p < .001), especially wound infection (0% vs. 26.3%, p = .002). Median hospital stays were 14 days and 24 days in the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively (p < .001). In the laparoscopic group, hospital mortality was 0%. Conclusions: The laparoscopic approach for small bowel and colorectal perforation in an emergency setting is a safe procedure in carefully selected patients and may contribute to decreased intraoperative blood loss, shortened hospital stay, and decreased incidence of postoperative complications, especially wound infection.
Laparoscopic Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation Repair Experience in 22 Cases and Experience

Qing-min ZENG,Fu-ming LEI,Wen-sheng HUANG,Yu-ming HONG,Zhao-ya GAO

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16662/j.cnki.1674-0742.2016.24.101

2016-01-01

Abstract:Objective Laparoscopic gastroduodenal ulcer perforation repair the preliminary operation experience and clini-cal experience. Methods Group selection from October 2012 to April 2016 22 cases of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation in patients with laparoscopic suture repair, the gastric ulcer perforation in 3 cases, 19 cases of duodenal ulcer perforation. Re-sults 22 cases are performed successfully, including transfer laparotomy in 4 cases, 3 cases of complications, including postoperative diaphragm under infection in 1 case, postoperative perforation in 1 case again, intestinal obstruction in 1 case, both the treatment and healing. No perioperative deaths, conclusion laparoscopic Conclusion Gastroduodenal ulcer perfora-tion repair should be strictly grasp the clinical indications, in order to reduce complications, intraoperative need to keep in mind the key points of operation;Revealing or repair difficulties and suspected cases of malignant lesions perforation should be timely transfer laparotomy.
[Experience on Postoperative Complications of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy].

C Lu,W,Y P Mou,Y C Zhou,Q C Zhu,H L Shao,K Chen,S D Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.11.006

2018-01-01

Abstract:Objective: To summarize the incidence and characteristics of postoperative complications after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPD), and to share our experience on management of complications. Methods: The clinical data of 320 LPD performed by a single team in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital and Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital between September 2012 and September 2017 were retrospectively analyzed, among which there were 196 males and 124 females with age of (60.2±11.6) years old.There were 306 patients who underwent standard LPD, and 14 patients who underwent extended LPD. The patients were divided into 2 groups of former 160 LPD and later 160 LPD according to the time order. By analyzing the differences of clinical outcomes between the two groups, especially focusing on the incidence of postoperative complications.The experience on management of complications was concluded. The prior surgical history of latter group was significantly higher than the former group(30.0%(48/160)vs. 18.8%(30/160), χ(2)=5.49, P=0.019), and the rest of baseline characteristics remained the comparable (P>0.05). For resectable lesions, LPD was performed by "No back" approach, following the principle of "From distal to cephalad, from ventral to dorsal, and from left to right" . As for the borderline resectable patients, LPD was performed by "Easy first" strategy. Student t test, χ(2) test or Fisher test was used to analyzed the data between the two groups respectively. Results: Of 320 LPD patients, 306 cases underwent standard LPD, 14 cases underwent LPD with resection of other organs.There were 278 LPD cases who followed "No back" approach, and 42 cases who followed "Easy first" strategy because of difficulty in creating the retro-pancreatic tunnel. And the overall morbidity was 32.2%(103/320) with reoperation rate of 5.3%(17/320). The perioperative mortality was 0.6%(2/320). The operation time of latter group was ((346.6±48.8)minutes), which was shorter than that of former group((358.0±54.4)minutes)(t=1.97, P=0.048). The blood loss of former and latter group remained comparable((207.9±135.8)ml vs.(189.6±121.4)ml, P=0.205). However, in subgroup analysis, the patients with blood loss less <200 ml of latter group decreased significantly from 59.4%(95/160) to 47.5%(76/160)(χ(2)=4.53, P=0.033). The overall morbidity of latter group was 28.8%(46/160), indicated a decrease from 35.6%(57/160) of former group without significant difference(P=0.188). Moreover, Grade A/B/C pancreatic fistula rate, Grade A/C bile leakage rate, Grade B/C postoperative hemorrhage rate of the later group tended to decrease, although they also didn't reach a significant difference. However, the abdominal infection rate decreased significantly(χ(2)=3.93, P=0.047). The length of hospital stay remained comparable(P=0.156). Conclusions: The most common complications after LPD were postoperative hemorrhage and pancreatic fistula. With specialized team and accumulated experience, the morbidity can decrease progressively by analyzing the leading cause and improving the technical skills.
Comparison and analysis of comprehensive curative effect of gastric perforation repair by laparoscope and laparotomy operation

Wen CHEN,Xionghui WU,Jinyuan HUANG

2015-01-01

Abstract:Objective To explore comparison of comprehensive curative effect of gastric perforation repair by laparoscope and laparotomy operation. MethodsClinical data of 67 patients with acute gastric perforation who were admitted to our hospital were analyzed and they were allocated to the laparotomy group with 27 cases and the laparoscope group 40 cases according to different treatment methods.Results The intraoperative blood loss, leaving bed time, gastrointestinal function recovery time, hospitalization stays and The volume of rinsing of the laparoscope group were all lower than those of the laparotomy group(t=12.37, 7.40, 8.48, 8.32, 35.75,P<0.05). Infection, perforation recurrence and incidence of abdominal abscess of the laparoscope group were lower than those of the laparotomy group(x2=11.75,11.75, 11.75,P<0.05). The difference was statistical significant.Conclusion Gastric perforation repair by laparoscope has fewer trauma and postoperative complications worthy of clinical promotion and application.
CD34+ selected autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis: report of toxicity and treatment results at one year of follow-up in 15 patients.

E. Carreras,A. Saiz,P. Marín,C. Martínez,M. Rovira,N. Villamor,M. Aymerich,M. Lozano,F. Fernández-Avilés,Á. Urbano-Izpizua,E. Montserrat,F. Graus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3324/%X

2003-02-01

Haematologica

Abstract:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is currently being evaluated as a therapy for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). We report the results of a phase II trial to evaluate feasibility and toxicity of CD34+ selected ASCT (CD34+/ASCT) and treatment results at one year of follow-up. DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with advanced secondary progressive (SP) or relapsing-remitting (RR) MS and confirmed worsening of the extended disability status scale (EDSS) in the previous year despite interferon or other immunotherapies were included. Peripheral blood stem cells were obtained by leukaphereses after mobilization with cyclophosphamide (Cy) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). CD34+ selection was performed by means of an Isolex 300 or CliniMACS device. BCNU, Cy and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) were administered as conditioning regimen. RESULTS Fifteen patients (9 SPMS and 6 RRMS) with a median EDSS of 6.0 (4.5-6.5) and a median of 3 (1-7) relapses in the previous year were included. Mobilization was unsuccessful in one patient. During mobilization, one patient had a transient neurologic deterioration. The main complication during ASCT were engraftment syndrome, which developed in three patients, CMV reactivation in one, and neurologic deterioration in two patients coinciding with high-fever related to ATG. Hematologic recovery was fast and complete in all cases. At 12 months, the EDSS had improved in three patients, worsened in two and remained stable in nine. Despite withdrawal of all immunosuppressive therapy only two patients had relapses. Magnetic resonance imaging showed disappearance of enhanced T1 lesions but oligoclonal bands persisted in the cerebrospinal fluid of all evaluated cases. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS CD34+/ASCT using BCNU, Cy and ATG as conditioning regimen has an acceptable toxicity and clearly reduces the progression of MS. Further follow-up is necessary to establish the real impact of this procedure on the long-term evolution of the disease.
PDZ domains: More than just a glue.

I. Bezprozvanny,Anton Maximov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.98.3.787

2001-01-30

Abstract:PDZ domains are part of a molecular scaffold that holds multiprotein signaling complexes together. It is generally believed that the role of PDZ domains is to position target ion channels, receptors, or other signaling molecules in correct spatial arrangement in relation to each other and to specialized regions of the cell (1–4). Two recent reports, one published in Cell (5) and another in this issue of PNAS (6) challenge this paradigm. These reports are focused on biochemical and functional analysis of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) channel interactions with multi-PDZ domain adaptor proteins CAP70 (CFTR-associated protein 70 kDa) (5) and NHERF (Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor) (6). CFTR contains a classical type I PDZ-domain binding carboxyl-terminal consensus −T-K/R-L, conserved from Xenopus to humans (5). Biochemical association of CFTR with the NHERF PDZ1 domain has previously been reported by several groups (7–9), and the importance of this interaction for apical sorting of CFTR in polarized epithelia has been demonstrated (10, 11). The previous findings fit with the general paradigm regarding the role of the PDZ domain containing proteins in membrane protein targeting in polarized cells.
Positively charged bulk Au particles as an efficient catalyst for oxidation of styrene with molecular oxygen.

Liang Wang,Bingsen Zhang,Wei Zhang,Jian Zhang,Xiong-hou Gao,Xiangju Meng,D. Su,F. Xiao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cc00309d

IF: 4.9

2013-03-28

Chemical Communications

Abstract:Positively charged bulk Au particles with size of 20-150 nm were formed on amino-modified porous polydivinylbenzene (Au/PN), which showed superior catalytic performance and good recyclability in the aerobic oxidation of styrene.

Insulin resistance negatively affects long-term outcome in non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disease after therapies to reduce atherosclerotic risk factors.

Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Has Better Outcomes Than Open Repair

Double muscle transfer for upper extremity reconstruction following complete avulsion of the brachial plexus.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Outcomes of laparoscopic modified Cellan-Jones repair versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer at a community hospital

Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer: A retrospective cohort study

A dual-population genetic algorithm for balanced exploration and exploitation

Laparoscopic repair vs open repair for perforated peptic ulcers: Quality of life assessment

Large deviations for stable like random walks on Z d with applications to random walks on wreath products ∗

Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials

Laparoscopic Versus Open Omental Patch Repair for Early Presentation of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

Comparative study of transumbilical single hole and double hole laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation

Risk factors influencing the early outcome results after laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer and their predictive value

Study of Risk Factors Leading to Conversion of Laparoscopic Simple Closure to Open Surgery in Perforated Peptic Ulcer

Validity of laparoscopic surgery for lower gastrointestinal perforations

Laparoscopic Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation Repair Experience in 22 Cases and Experience

[Experience on Postoperative Complications of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy].

Comparison and analysis of comprehensive curative effect of gastric perforation repair by laparoscope and laparotomy operation

CD34+ selected autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis: report of toxicity and treatment results at one year of follow-up in 15 patients.

PDZ domains: More than just a glue.

Positively charged bulk Au particles as an efficient catalyst for oxidation of styrene with molecular oxygen.