How the brain differentiates human and monkey faces: Neuromagnetic evidence from spatiotemporal dynamics

Emi Yamada,Akinori Takeda,Hisato Nakazono,Mutsuhide Tanaka,Katsuya Ogata,Shozo Tobimatsu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.11.018
2024-11-23
Neurosciences
Abstract:Highlights • We studied spatiotemporal dynamics of M170 modulation for human and monkey faces. • In the sensor analysis, inverted and monkey faces differently modulated M170. • In the source analysis, the ventral fusiform gyrus was activated by upright faces. • The dorsal brain areas were activated more by upright faces than by inverted faces. • Inverted human faces and monkey faces are processed differently in the FG. Face recognition is an important aspect of human non-verbal communication. Event-related potentials or magnetic fields, such as the N170/M170 component, are considered essential neural markers of face processing. Compared to upright human faces, inverted human faces and upright but not inverted animal faces cause longer latencies and larger amplitudes of these components. However, the mechanisms underlying this factor remain unclear. To elucidate the spatiotemporal dynamics of the processing of inverted human and animal faces, we recorded face-selective responses (M170) to upright and inverted human and monkey faces using a 306-channel whole-head magnetoencephalography. Sensor analysis showed an increased M170 latency and amplitude for inverted human and upright animal faces. However, in the source analysis, the observed modulations of the estimated spatiotemporal dynamics were different from the sensor results: irrespective of species, upright faces activated wider areas in the ventral and dorsal visual regions compared with inverted faces. Additionally, face orientation differentially modulated the anterior region of the fusiform gyrus (FG) in both face categories. These results suggest that spatiotemporal dynamics differ in face orientation regardless of category and that the FG contributes little or nothing to the M170 modulation recorded in the scalp sensor. Furthermore, we demonstrated that inverted human and animal faces are processed via different mechanisms.
clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?