The Effect of Expert Patient Simulation on Clinical Judgment: A Quasi-Experimental Study
Sanjay Shinde,Firew Tiruneh,Dinaol Abdissa Fufa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S402610
2023-07-18
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Abstract:Sanjay Shinde, Firew Tiruneh, Dinaol Abdissa Fufa Department of Midwifery, Mizan Tepi University, Mizan Teferi, Ethiopia Correspondence: Firew Tiruneh, Email Background: Worldwide, quality education is one of the important tools to improve healthcare quality. Healthcare practitioners must be competent in their clinical judgement to meet clients' need. However, poor clinical judgment skill accounts for almost one-third of all patient problems in health care. Expert patient simulation has been used as a training method for clinical judgement skill. However, according to empirical studies, using expert patients to develop clinical judgement skill is unclear. The method is effective in one situation but not in another. Objective: To examine the effect of expert patient simulation on the clinical judgment skill of health science students of Mizan-Tepi University. Methods: A pre-test/post-test quasi-experimental design was used on 92 randomly selected samples from the graduating cohort of midwifery students. The research subjects who took part in the experiment were picked at random. Tools included the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument (C-CEI ® ), the Learning Satisfaction and Self-Confidence Questionnaire, and the Kolb Learning Style Inventory (LSI). The Wilcoxon-signed rank test was utilized to compare the self-confidence scores among intervention and control group of students, and the paired sample test was used to compare clinical judgment scores. Cohen's d was used to assess the effect size, and Spearman correlation was used to explore the association. Results: Clinical decision-making ability and self-confidence measures revealed statistical and practical differences between before and after simulation. There was a mean difference of 2.28 (95% CI, 1.78, 2.79), t (45)=9.13, p 0.001, and an effect size of 1.3, p 0.001. A pre-and post-simulation self-confidence measure showed statistically significant improvement after simulation (W = 1, Z = − 3.57, P 0.001). A moderately significant positive connection (r = 0.419, p 0.004) was also discovered. Conclusion: The study found that human expert patient simulation is a tremendous clinical training technique for improving students' clinical decision-making skill competency and self-confidence. Keywords: effect, patient, simulation, clinical judgment, health science students Worldwide, education is considered as a human right and one of the important tools to improve health and reduce poverty. ( https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education/overview ) Among the 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs), education quality and equity have been selected as agenda goals. 1 In low- and middle-income countries, there has been a great progress in primary education and, to a lesser extent, access to higher education. However, the quality of education in higher institutions remains a critical challenge. The impact of poor educational quality of students studying midwifery has been linked to poor quality of poor quality of health care services. 2 Constant change characterizes the modern healthcare system. Healthcare practitioners must be competent in order to be effective in the dynamic, complicated healthcare system and to support clients in obtaining favourable outcomes. Indeed, professionals must develop accurate and believable clinical judgment skill. 3 Clinical judgment is a difficult skill to master. It is essential in clinical scenarios that are unclear by definition and rife with value conflicts between individuals with opposing agendas. Almost all health practitioners consider clinical judgment to be a vital ability. 4 Diagnostic and management errors are prevalent in health care. Diagnostic mistakes account for almost one-third of all patient complications. Improving healthcare personnel's diagnostic and clinical judgment skills as they advance through their training is part of the solution. 5 Health science students are required to grasp evidence-based medicine and analytical and clinical judgment skills throughout the degree. 5 Clinical judgment skill has been highlighted as vital in health care education for more than 50 years. 6 Good clinical decision-makers have habits of mind that include confidence, contextual perspective, creativity, adaptability, inquisitiveness, intellectual integrity, intuition, open-mindedness, perseverance, and introspection. 7 Critical thinking is utilized to generate a sound clinical judgment. The ability to think clearly and rationally about a specific clinical scenario of a patient in order to develop an appropriate clinical diagnosis is referred to as critical thinking. However, most health professional education programmes did -Abstract Truncated-