Abstract:In contemporary China, the rapidly urbanized cities are exposed to a broad range of natural and human-made emergencies, such as COVID-19. Responding to emergencies successfully requires widespread participation of local government sectors that engages in diversified collaboration behaviors across organizational boundaries for achieving sustainability. However, the multi-organizational collaborative process is highly dynamic and complex, as well as its outcomes are uncertain underlying the emergency response network. Examining characteristics of the collaborative process and exploring how collaborative behaviors local governmental sectors engaging in the impact their perceived outcomes is essential to understand how disastrous situations are addressed by collaborative efforts in emergency management. This research investigates diversified collaborative behaviors in emergency response and then examines this using a multi-dimensional model consisting of joint decision making, joint implementation, compromised autonomy, resource sharing, and trust building. We surveyed 148 local governments and their affiliated sectors in China in-depth understanding how collaborative processes contribute to perceived outcomes from perspectives of participating sectors in the context of a centralized political-administrative system. A structural equation model (SEM) is employed to encode multiple dimensions of the collaborative process, perceived outcomes, as well as their relationships. The empirical finding indicates that joint decision making and implementation positively affect the perceived outcomes significantly. The empirical results indicate that joint decision making and joint implementation affect perceived outcomes significantly. Instead, resource sharing and trust building do not affect the outcomes positively as expected. Additionally, compromised autonomy negatively affects the collaborative outcomes. We also discuss the institutional advantages for achieving successful outcomes in emergency management in China by reducing the degree of compromised autonomy. Our findings provide insight that can improve efforts to build and maintain a collaborative process to respond to emergencies.

Participatory governance in public health emergencies: A case study of Quanzhou from a legal perspective

Innovate emergency governance mechanism of urban communities in response to major public health events: A qualitative study from multiple principals in Guangzhou, China

Community Resilience Governance on Public Health Crisis in China

Public governance mechanism in the prevention and control of the COVID-19: information, decision-making and execution

Public Voice via Social Media: Role in Cooperative Governance during Public Health Emergency

Tripartite Evolutionary Game Model for Public Health Emergencies

Collaborative Leadership, Collective Action, and Community Governance against Public Health Crises under Uncertainty: A Case Study of the Quanjingwan Community in China

From Bureaucratic Coordination to a Data-Driven Model: Transformation and Capacity Building of Community-Based Prevention and Control of Public Health Events

[Improvement of China's Legal System for Public Health Emergency Management from the Perspective of Lifecycle Management].

An Investigation into Local Government Plans for Public Health Emergencies in China.

Logic Analysis of How the Emergency Management Legal System Used to Deal with Public Emerging Infectious Diseases under Balancing of Competing Interests—The Case of COVID-19

Collaborative governance in emergencies: Community food supply in COVID-19 in Wuhan, China

Effective Responses to Public Emergencies at the Urban Community Level: A Perspective of COVID-19 Prevention and Control

Whether Social Participation Can Affect the Central Government Public Policy Response to the COVID-19 in China

Assessment of Resilient Governance Capacity Toward COVID-19 in Chinese Cities

Soft Law in the Prevention and Control of the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: Between Legality Concerns and Limited Participatory Possibilities

Citizen Participation in China

Preparing for and Responding to Public Health Emergencies in China: A Focus Group Study

Community Services and Social Involvement in COVID-19 Governance: Evidence from China

Understanding the Collaborative Process and Its Effects on Perceived Outcomes during Emergency Response in China: From Perspectives of Local Government Sectors

Application of Artificial Intelligence to Social Governance Capabilities under Public Health Emergencies