Abstract:Digitalization has expanded the scope of citizen participation. Nevertheless, there are no conclusive findings on online citizen participation and inclusive policymaking. This study adds in line with the discussion with a fresh perspective of institutional bias. It presents new evidence by examining the process, participants, policy agenda, and sentiments of public opinions from the government-led and Internet-empowered citizen participation regarding the 2017–2035 Shanghai Master Plan. Four findings are reported based on the in-depth case study with text and sentiment analysis. First, the government-led model provides institutionalized opportunities for citizen engagement throughout the policy process, while the Internet-empowered citizen participation is characterized by contingency and ad hoc. Second, the government-led model remains elite-dominated, while the Internet empowers a wider scope of stakeholders with an open and popularized participation platform. Third, the public opinion from the Internet-empowered model often goes beyond or even against the pre-defined official principles and goals. In contrast, the civic discussion in the government-led model influences policy by changing the sequence of policy agenda or providing focus within the official setting. Fourth, citizens, especially the experts, are more likely to give positive feedback in the government-led model than the Internet-empowered approach. These findings confirm and identify the remaining institutional bias that hinders inclusive policymaking in the Internet age. Theoretically, it reminds scholars to examine the institutional arrangements regarding citizen participation carefully. Practically, it indicates that the central government could facilitate inclusive policymaking at the local level by reducing the institutional bias of the government-led approach and utilizing text and sentiment analysis to urge the local government's response to Internet-empowered public opinion.

Citizen Participation in China

On the Theory and Practice Mechanisms of Citizen Participation in Local Governance

Civil society organizations in China: Navigating the local government for more inclusive environmental governance

Public Participation in China’s Water Governance

Transition in Public Participation in Chinese Water Management

The Missing Piece of the Puzzle: How Different Water-related Public Concerns Contribute to Water Governance in China

Citizen participation in the governance of public affairs:taking Guangdong "No Fake Medicine Community" for example

Government-led and Internet-empowered Citizen Participation in China's Policymaking: A Case Study of the Shanghai 2035 Master Plan.

Chapter Three. Citizen Participation and China’s Governance Reforms

Public Participation in Environmental Management in China: Status Quo and Mode Innovation

The Study Of Contemporary Chinese Citizen'S Effective Participation In Public Decision-Making

Citizen Participation in China’s Eco-City Development. Will ‘New-Type Urbanization’ Generate a Breakthrough in Realizing It?

How to Enhance Public Participation in Environmental Governance? Evidence from China

Characteristics of Public Participation in EA: the Potential to Improve Sustainable Environmental Management in China

Citizen-initiated interactions in urban water governance: How public authorities respond to micro-level opinions related to nature-based solutions

Study on the organization of water-conservation activities and guiding strategies for urban communities based on public participation in China

The Problems and Countermeasures of Citizen Participation in Urban Community Governance

The influence of public awareness on public participation in environmental governance: Empirical evidence in China

The impact of the policy and behavior of public participation on environmental governance performance: Empirical analysis based on provincial panel data in China

Citizen Participation in Government Performance Measurement:A Historical Review and Assessment

Citizen Action and Policy Change