Abstract:Background/Objectives: High-throughput single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) workflows produce libraries that demand extensive sequencing. However, standard next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods remain expensive, contributing to the high running costs of single-cell experiments and often negatively affecting the sample numbers and statistical strength of such projects. In recent years, a plethora of new sequencing technologies have become available to researchers through several manufacturers, often providing lower-cost alternatives to standard NGS. Methods: In this study, we compared data generated from mouse scRNA-seq libraries sequenced with both standard Illumina sequencing by synthesis (Illumina SBS) and MGI's DNA nanoball sequencing (DNBSEQ). Results: Our findings reveal similar overall performance using both technologies. DNBSEQ exhibited mildly superior sequence quality compared to Illumina SBS, as evidenced by higher Phred scores, lower read duplication rates and a greater number of genes mapping to the reference genome. Yet these improvements did not translate into meaningful differences in single-cell analysis parameters in our experiments, including detection of additional genes within cells, gene expression saturation levels and numbers of identified cells, with both technologies demonstrating equally robust performance in these aspects. The data produced by both sequencing platforms also produced comparable analytical outcomes for single-cell analysis. No significant difference in the annotation of cells into different cell types was observed and the same top genes were differentially expressed between populations and experimental conditions. Conclusions: Overall, our data demonstrate that alternative technologies can be applied to sequence scRNA-seq libraries, generating virtually indistinguishable results compared to standard methods, and providing cost-effective alternatives.

A comprehensive analysis framework for evaluating commercial single-cell RNA sequencing technologies

Comparative Analysis of Commercial Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Technologies

Systematic comparative analysis of single cell RNA-sequencing methods

Comparative Analysis of Sequencing Technologies for Single-Cell Transcriptomics

A multicenter study benchmarking single-cell RNA sequencing technologies using reference samples

Comparative performance of the BGI and Illumina sequencing technology for single-cell RNA-sequencing

The Comparison of Two Single-cell Sequencing Platforms: BD Rhapsody and 10x Genomics Chromium

Comparative Analysis of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Methods with and without Sample Multiplexing

scRNA-seq mixology: towards better benchmarking of single cell RNA-seq analysis methods

Benchmarking UMI-based single-cell RNA-seq preprocessing workflows

Optimum processing conditions for single cell RNA sequencing on frozen human PBMCs

Benchmarking single-cell RNA-sequencing protocols for cell atlas projects

Direct Comparative Analyses of 10X Genomics Chromium and Smart-seq2

A risk-reward examination of sample multiplexing reagents for single cell RNA-Seq

Illumina SBS Sequencing and DNBSEQ Perform Similarly for Single-Cell Transcriptomics

Comparative Analysis of NovaSeq 6000 and MGISEQ 2000 Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data.

Performance comparison of high throughput single-cell RNA-Seq platforms in complex tissues

Comparative analysis of droplet-based ultra-high-throughput single-cell RNA-seq systems

Benchmarking UMI-based single cell RNA-sequencing preprocessing workflows

Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Analysis: A Step-by-Step Overview

Systematic benchmarking of single-cell ATAC-sequencing protocols