Comparative Analysis of Commercial Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Technologies

Marco De Simone,Jonathan Hoover,Julia Lau,Hayley Bennett,Bing Wu,Cynthia Chen,Hari Menon,Amelia Au-Yeung,Sean Lear,Samir Vaidya,Minyi Shi,Jessica M. Lund,Ana Xavier-Magalhaes,Yuxin Liang,Ahmet Kurdoglu,William E. O'Gorman,Zora Modrusan,Daniel Le,Spyros Darmanis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.18.599579

2024-06-18

Abstract:This study evaluates ten commercially available single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) approaches across four technology groups: Emulsion-based kits from 10x Genomics and Fluent Biosciences; Microwell-based kits from Becton Dickinson, Honeycomb Technologies and Singerlon Technologies; Combinatorial-indexing kits from Parse Biosciences and Scale Biosciences; and a Matrigel-based kit from Scipio Biosciences. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from a single donor were used to assess analytical performance. Key features such as sample compatibility, cost, and experimental duration were also compared. Notably, superior analytical performance was demonstrated by the Chromium Fixed RNA Profiling kit from 10x Genomics, which uniquely features probe hybridization for transcript detection. Additionally, the Rhapsody WTA kit from Becton Dickinson provided a cost-effective balance of performance and expense per cell. With a rich dataset of 218,154 cells, this work provides a basis for differentiating commercial scRNA-seq technologies, which is intended to facilitate the effective application and further methodological development of single cell transcriptomics.

Molecular Biology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper aims to solve is to systematically evaluate the performance and characteristics of single - cell RNA sequencing (scRNA - seq) techniques available on the current market, so as to provide guidance for researchers to select appropriate single - cell transcriptomics methods. Specifically, the researchers compared ten commercial single - cell RNA sequencing techniques, which can be divided into four major categories: emulsion - based kits, microwell - based kits, combinatorial indexing kits and a Matrigel - based kit.

### Main Objectives:
1. **Performance Evaluation**: Evaluate the performance of different techniques at the library construction, gene detection and cell levels, including key indicators such as cell recovery rate, gene and UMI (Unique Molecular Identifier) counts, read mapping efficiency, etc.
2. **Cost Analysis**: Compare the cost - effectiveness of different techniques, including cost per cell, experimental duration and equipment cost.
3. **Sample Compatibility**: Evaluate the compatibility of different techniques with different types of samples (such as fresh cells, fixed cells, FFPE tissues, etc.).
4. **Technical Characteristics**: Summarize the characteristics of each technique, such as whether cell fixation is required and whether high - throughput processing is supported.

### Research Background:
In recent years, the development of single - cell technologies has greatly promoted the progress of biomedical research, revealing many previously unknown cell types, states and lineages. However, with the diversification of technologies, how to select the technology that best suits specific research needs has become a challenge. Through systematic comparative analysis, this paper aims to fill this knowledge gap and provide a basis for researchers to select appropriate technologies.

### Method Overview:
- **Sample Selection**: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from a single donor were used for evaluation.
- **Technical Classification**: The evaluated techniques were divided into four categories: emulsion - based, microwell - based, combinatorial indexing and Matrigel - based.
- **Performance Indicators**: Including cell recovery rate, gene and UMI counts, read mapping efficiency, the proportion of mitochondrial and ribosomal protein genes, etc.
- **Cost Analysis**: Calculate the cost per cell, and consider equipment cost and experimental duration.

### Result Highlights:
- The **10x Genomics' Chromium Fixed RNA Profiling kit** showed the best analytical performance, especially in terms of gene and UMI counts.
- The **Becton Dickinson's Rhapsody WTA kit** provided a more cost - effective balance.
- **Differences in cell type distribution among different techniques**: Some techniques (such as Fluent) had a large deviation in cell type proportion from the reference standard (CyTOF).
- **Technical Characteristics**: Some techniques (such as 10x FRP) were able to process fixed cells and FFPE tissues, expanding the application range of single - cell RNA sequencing.

Through these systematic evaluations, the researchers hope to help researchers select the most appropriate single - cell RNA sequencing technique according to specific experimental requirements.