Abstract:Objectives: To assess the ability of the aortic aneurysm volume (AAV), aneurysmal lumen volume (ALV), and aneurysmal thrombus volume (ATV) to predict the need for aortic reintervention when using the maximal aortic diameter as a reference. Methods: This monocentric retrospective study included 31 consecutive patients who underwent successful thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to treat an atheromatous thoracic aortic aneurysm. All patients underwent clinical and computed tomography angiography (CTA) for 3 years after TEVAR. The patients were categorized into group 0 if no aortic reintervention was required during the follow-up period and categorized into group 1 if they experienced a type I or III endoleak or aneurysm diameter increase requiring intervention. The maximum aneurysm sac diameter and the AAV, ALV, and ATV were calculated using CTA images obtained preoperatively (T0) and at 6–12 months (T1), 24 months (T2), and 36 months (T3) postoperatively, and their changes over time were analyzed. Correlations between diameter and changes in AAV, ALV, and ATV were assessed, and the association between diameter and volume changes and reintervetion was examined. The cutoff values for predicting the need for reintervention was determined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The accuracy of volume change versus diameter change for predicting the need for reintervention was analyzed. Results: There were no significant differences in terms of the mean aneurysm diameter or AAV, ALV or ATV between the groups at preoperative CTA or after one year of follow-up imaging. The mean ATV was higher in group 1 than in group 0 at 2 years (187.6 ± 86.3 mL vs. 114.7 ± 64.7 mL; p = 0.057) and after 3 years (195.0 ± 86.7 mL vs. 82.1 ± 39.9 mL; p = 0.013). The maximal diameter was greater in group 1 than in group 0 at 3 years (67.3 ± 9.5 mm vs. 55.3 ± 12.6 mm; p = 0.044). The rate of AAV change between T0 and T1 was significantly higher in group 1 (7 ± 4.5%) than in group 0 (−6 ± 6.8%; p < 0.001). The rate of ATV change between T1-T3 was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 0 (34 ± 40.9% vs. −13 ± 14.4% (p = 0.041)); similar results were observed for the rate of ATV change between T2 and T3 (27 ± 50.1% for group 1 vs. −8 ± 49.5% in group 0 (p < 0.001)). According to our multivariate analysis, the annual growth rate for AAV between T0 and T1 was the only independent factor that was significantly associated with aortic reintervention (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.84, OR = 1.57, p = 0.025; optimal cutoff +0.4%). An increase in the annual growth rate of the ATV between T0 and T3 was independently associated with the need for aortic reintervention (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.90, OR = 1.11, p = 0.0347; optimal cutoff +10.1%). Conclusions: Aortic volume analysis can predict the need for aortic reintervention more accurately and earlier than maximal aortic diameter.

Volumetric analysis in primary and residual type B aortic dissection treated with STABILISE technique can predict aortic reintervention

Initial Study of the Extended STABILISE Technique for Complete Remodeling in Aortic Dissection

Risk Factors for Incomplete Aortic Remodeling With Stent-Assisted Balloon-Induced Intimal Disruption and Relamination in Aortic Dissection Repair for Complicated Aortic Dissection: Results of a Multicenter Study

STABILISE (Stent-Assisted Balloon-Induced Intimal Disruption and Relamination in Aortic Dissection Repair) Is Associated With Good Anatomical Results on the Distal Thoracoabdominal Aorta at 2 Years

Long-Term Aortic Remodeling after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Type B Dissections.

STABILISE for acute type B aortic dissection

Aortic Outcome after Implementation of a Treatment Strategy for Type B Aortic Dissection Involving the Aortic Arch

Staging reinterventions for remodeling of residual aortic dissection: a single-center retrospective study

Aortic remodelling and late outcomes following thoracic endovascular repair with a bare-metal stent distal extension among patients with complicated type-B aortic dissection

Antegrade stenting of the descending thoracic aorta during DeBakey type 1 acute aortic dissection repair

Abstract 590: A Model Of Aortic Arch Stenting For Dissection Repair Using Finite Element Analysis And Computational Fluid Dynamics

One-year results of the flowdynamics dense mesh stent for residual dissection after proximal repair of stanford type a or type b aortic dissection: a multicenter, prospective and randomized study

Volumetric Measurements Improve the Accuracy of Aortic Remodeling Prediction in Aortic Dissection

The Value of Aortic Volume and Intraluminal Thrombus Quantification for Predicting Aortic Events after Endovascular Thoracic Aneurysm Repair

Long-Term Outcomes of Antegrade Thoracic Stent Grafting During Repair of Acute DeBakey I Dissection

Similar Midterm Clinical Outcomes and Aortic Remodeling in Bifurcated and Straight Aortic Stent Grafts Used to Treat Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection

Early results of bare metal extension stent for thoracoabdominal aortic dissection

Features of Aortic Remodeling in Stanford Type B Subacute Aortic Dissection after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair and the Influential Factors

[Aortic Remodeling in Uncomplicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Stratified by The Timing of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair:A Retrospective Cohort Study]

Review and mid-term follow-up of Stanford type B aortic dissections treated by endovascular placement of stent-grafts

Numerical Modeling and Simulations of Type B Aortic Dissection Treated by Stent-Grafts with Different Oversizing Ratios