Abstract:Background: Negative remodeling of the distal aorta due to residual dissection significantly impacts the long-term outcomes of dissection patients after proximal repair of acute aortic dissection. Branched/fenestrated aortic stents are technically demanding, and studies of the first generation of multilayer flow modulators for tackling this clinical scenario are few and limited. The single-center results from a multicenter, prospective, and randomized controlled study aimed to verify the safety and effectiveness of a newly-designed flowdynamics dense mesh stent for treating residual dissection after proximal repair. Methods: Patients with nonchronic residual dissection involving visceral branches were prospectively enrolled in 3 centers (ChiCTR1900023638). Eligible patients were randomly assigned to the flowdynamics dense mesh stent (FDMS) group and control group. Follow-up visits were arranged at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after recruitment. The primary endpoints were all-cause and aortic-related mortality. The secondary endpoints included visceral branch occlusion, reintervention, and severe adverse events. Morphological changes were analyzed to exhibit the therapeutic effect. Our center participated in the multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial, and the preliminary single-center experience was reported. Results: Thirty-six patients were enrolled in our center, and the baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable. Thirty-four patients completed the 12 month follow-up. Freedom from all-cause and aortic-related death were 94.4% and 100%. All visceral branches remained patent in the FDMS group. Increased area of the true lumen (1.03±0.38 vs 0.48±0.63 cm2 at the plane below renal arteries, p=0.006; 1.27±0.80 vs 0.32±0.50 cm2 at the plane 5 cm below renal arteries, p<0.001) and decreased area of the false lumen at the plane below renal arteries (-1.03±0.84 vs -0.15±1.21 cm2, p=0.023) were observed in the FDMS group compared with those parameters in the control group. The FDMS group showed a significant increase in true lumen volume (p<0.001) and a significant decrease in false lumen volume (p=0.018). Conclusions: This newly-designed FDMS for endovascular repair of residual dissection after the proximal repair is safe and effective at 12 months. Clinical impact: One-year results of the randomized controlled clinical trial indicated the short-term safety and promising effect of FDMS on treating non-chronic residual dissection after proximal repair. At the 12th-month follow-up, the true lumen expanded, the false lumen shrunk and all visceral arteries kept patent. As far as I'm concerned, this is the first randomized controlled study concerning utilizing multilayer flow mesh stent treating aortic dissection. Despite a preliminary single-center report, our results are supposed to provide high-quality evidence to guide clinical practice and fill the gap in the application of FDMS.

One-year results of the flowdynamics dense mesh stent for residual dissection after proximal repair of stanford type a or type b aortic dissection: a multicenter, prospective and randomized study

Early Results of the Newly-Designed Flowdynamics Dense Mesh Stent for Residual Dissection After Proximal Repair of Stanford Type A or Type B Aortic Dissection: A Preliminary Single-Center Report From a Multicenter, Prospective, and Randomized Study

Initial Study of the Extended STABILISE Technique for Complete Remodeling in Aortic Dissection

Clinical Results and Aortic Remodeling After Endovascular Treatment for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection With the “Fabulous” Stent System

A Hemodynamic Analysis of Fenestrated Physician-Modified Endograft Repair for Complicated Aortic Dissections Involving the Visceral Arteries.

Endovascular Repair of Postdissection Aortic Aneurysms Using Physician-Modified Endografts

Endovascular Treatment of Complicated Aortic Aneurysms Using a Modified Flow-Diverting Strategy: Mid- to Long-Term Outcome from a Multicenter Cohort Study

Long-term outcomes of treatment with different stent grafts in acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection

Aortic remodelling and late outcomes following thoracic endovascular repair with a bare-metal stent distal extension among patients with complicated type-B aortic dissection

Staging reinterventions for remodeling of residual aortic dissection: a single-center retrospective study

Early Experience With a Novel Dissection-Specific Stent-Graft to Prevent Distal Stent-Graft-Induced New Entry Tears After Thoracic Endovascular Repair of Chronic Type B Aortic Dissections

Midterm Results of Prospective Study for Aortic dissection with Gutter-Plugging Chimney Stent-Graft

Multilayer Flow Modulator Stent for Aortic Pathology: A Meta-Analysis and Additional Data from a Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort

Endovascular repair during complex thoracic aortic dissection using a micropore stent graft: Midterm follow-up clinical outcomes

Mid-term Results of a Prospective Study for Aortic Dissection with a Gutter-Plugging Chimney Stent Graft.

Aortic remodelling based on false lumen communications in patients undergoing acute type I dissection repair with AMDS hybrid prosthesis: a substudy of the DARTS trial

Risk Factors for Incomplete Aortic Remodeling With Stent-Assisted Balloon-Induced Intimal Disruption and Relamination in Aortic Dissection Repair for Complicated Aortic Dissection: Results of a Multicenter Study

A Novel Solution for Distal Dilation of Chronic Dissection After Repair Involving Visceral Branches: The Road Block Strategy

False Lumen Stent-Grafts for Repair of Postdissection Aortic Aneurysms.

Similar Midterm Clinical Outcomes and Aortic Remodeling in Bifurcated and Straight Aortic Stent Grafts Used to Treat Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection

Review and mid-term follow-up of Stanford type B aortic dissections treated by endovascular placement of stent-grafts