Abstract:Emerging discussions on the responsible government use of algorithmic technologies propose transparency and public participation as key mechanisms for preserving accountability and trust. But in practice, the adoption and use of any technology shifts the social, organizational, and political context in which it is embedded. Therefore translating transparency and participation efforts into meaningful, effective accountability must take into account these shifts. We adopt two theoretical frames, Mulligan and Nissenbaum's handoff model and Star and Griesemer's boundary objects, to reveal such shifts during the U.S. Census Bureau's adoption of differential privacy (DP) in its updated disclosure avoidance system (DAS) for the 2020 census. This update preserved (and arguably strengthened) the confidentiality protections that the Bureau is mandated to uphold, and the Bureau engaged in a range of activities to facilitate public understanding of and participation in the system design process. Using publicly available documents concerning the Census' implementation of DP, this case study seeks to expand our understanding of how technical shifts implicate values, how such shifts can afford (or fail to afford) greater transparency and participation in system design, and the importance of localized expertise throughout. We present three lessons from this case study toward grounding understandings of algorithmic transparency and participation: (1) efforts towards transparency and participation in algorithmic governance must center values and policy decisions, not just technical design decisions; (2) the handoff model is a useful tool for revealing how such values may be cloaked beneath technical decisions; and (3) boundary objects alone cannot bridge distant communities without trusted experts traveling alongside to broker their adoption.

PUBLIC‐MAKING IN HYPER‐DIVERSITY: Politics, Elections and the Democratic Party in Queens, New York

The High Line and the ideal of democratic public space

Public goods and diversity in democracies and non‐democracies

Status inequality and public goods

Placing Racial Stereotypes in Context: Social Desirability and the Politics of Racial Hostility

Ethnic Diversity and Ethnic Discrimination: Explaining Local Public Goods Provision

'SANCTUARY FOR ALL' OR 'SANCTUARY FOR THE DESERVING': How Municipal Bureaucracies Mediate and Decide Contentious Struggles over Urban Citizenship

An investigation of politicians' responses to urban diversity and disadvantage: The case of the Danish 'parallel societies'

Taking stock of social-political polarization in Asia: political communication, social media and digital governance

The Fruits of Diversity and Globalization: Participation and Contributions of East-Asian Scholars in Public Administration

Linking Organizational Political Diversity with Satisfaction and Performance: The Implications of Presidential Elections

Political Discussions in Homogeneous and Cross-Cutting Communication Spaces

Asymmetry in Political Geography and Compactness in Districting: a Computational Analysis of Bias

Dominant-Party Citizens

Public Spheres in Twitter- and Blogosphere. Evidence from the US

Political organizing and narrative framing in the sharing economyAirbnb host clubs in New York City

The advantages of Suburban enclaves over urban enclaves for community empowerment: Korean immigrants in greater New York

Epidemiologizing Culture: Scaling Chineseness through Narratives of Stigma in New York City

Political Discourse in Chinese Urban Community: Pragmatic Utility and Ideological Fatigue

Algorithmic Transparency and Participation through the Handoff Lens: Lessons Learned from the U.S. Census Bureau's Adoption of Differential Privacy

New Media, Political Discourse and Public Opinion: A Theoretical Analysis of Social Media Intertextuality and Discursivity and its Effect on Governance in Devolved Political Units in Kenya