Abstract:Anxious about the failure of decisionmakers to significantly reduce ‘the human impact’ on Earth, many global change researchers are looking for ways and means to influence public policy, business strategy and civil society more strongly. As part of this, there is a greater emphasis on understanding and altering the ‘human dimensions’ of global environmental change. A number of physical and society‐environment geographers are involved in this endeavour, building on some valuable past achievements. But what lies ahead? I address this question by examining the rich idea of a ‘social contract’ – one little used in disciplinary debates about Geography's past, present and future, but now relatively common in certain wider discussions of anthropogenic global change. I suggest that there are currents of thinking in contemporary Geography that can offer something both new and much needed in the world of global change research. That ‘something’ is not ever more integrated, accurate analysis of dynamic, coupled human–environment interactions – as if we live in just one world requiring ever more ‘joined‐up’ and granular description, explanation and prediction. Instead, it is an approach to research that eschews ontological holism, epistemological monism and the fact–value dualism. This approach suggests that taking the human dimensions of environmental change seriously requires a new kind of global change research that is at once overtly political and intellectually plural. Far from being a charter for ‘bias’ or ‘relativism’, I show that this approach expresses the rich senses of responsibility, accountability and representation contained in the version of a new social contract I advocate here. A wider implication of my argument is that Geography needs new stories about the nature and merits of ‘intra‐disciplinarity’, ones better attuned to the role of research in fostering democracy in our ‘post‐normal’ times. Thinking afresh about how research should influence society promises to alter many geographers’ sense of self while usefully repurposing global change research across several disciplines.

Staying on Track: Why AP Human Geography Should Steward Its Operations in Support of the Discipline

Whither physical geography Redux: Revisiting the place of physical geography in the United States

Promoting Lifelong Professional Development in Geography Education: International Perspectives on Developing the Scholarship of Teaching in Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century

Dwelling with sustainable pedagogy aboard Amtrak: pathways for transdisciplinary and affective general education

An Appeal for the Re-Incorporation of Heartland and Rimland Theories into the Advanced Placement® Course & Exam Description

Restructuring physical geography

Geography and the new social contract for global change research

Let Geography Die: The Rise, Fall, and “Unfinished Business” of Geography at Harvard

Challenges of teaching sports geography in higher education

Innovative Approaches to Teaching in Geography

Geography Teaching and the New Technologies: Opportunities and Challenges

Physical geography contributes

Human-Environment Thinking and K-12 Geography Education

Achieving Human Potential Through Geography Education: A Capabilities Approach to Curriculum Making in Schools

Geographic contributions to institutional curriculum reform in Australia: the challenge of embedding field-based learning

Discovering Innovative Curricular Models for School Geography

Towards a pedagogical policy turn in geography

Delivering the discipline: Teaching geography and planning during COVID‐19

Geography Education for Sustainable Development

Disruption, Discovery, and Field Courses: A Case Study of Student Engagement during a Global Pandemic

In the Critical Zone: Geography at the U.S. Geological Survey