Similarities and differences between Chinese two-character words and their constituent characters in norm-feature correlations

Lifeng Xue,Degao Li,Dangui Song,Wenling Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06212-0
IF: 2.8
2024-06-25
Current Psychology
Abstract:The graphic units in Chinese are Chinese characters (characters), most of which often join with others to form words of two or more characters. High-frequency two-character words (2C-words) tend to be composed of high-frequency characters. However, whether similarities exist between 2C-words and their constituent characters in other features remains an open question. The present study used a sample of 7,311 commonly used 2C-words (2CWs) and their constituent characters (CCs) to compare correlations among features that are common to 2CWs and characters. For both the 2CWs and the CCs, age of acquisition (AoA) was negatively correlated with frequency, sensory experience arousal was positively correlated with concreteness and emotion arousal and imageability was positively correlated with concreteness, sensory experience arousal, and emotion arousal. However, as the result of changes in AoA, skilled readers were more likely to be aware of changes in concreteness, imageability, and sensory experience arousal for the 2CWs than for the CCs. They might be less aware of valence, concreteness, number of strokes, and number of meanings but more conscious of emotion arousal and imageability of the 2CWs than of the CCs. The implications are that words and characters are important units in parallel and that words are both associated with and independent of their constituent characters. This may suggest a resolution to the debates about whether words or characters should be taken as the basic structural units in the Chinese language.
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?