Abstract:Charles B. Simone II New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA Submitted Jan 05, 2024. Accepted for publication Jan 20, 2024. Published online Jan 29, 2024. doi: 10.21037/apm-24-23 The November 2023 issues of Annals of Palliative Medicine featured 3 Editorials, 5 Original Articles, 19 Review Articles, 3 Editorial Commentary Articles, and 1 Case Report, along with 3 Letters to the Editor. One of the Editorials (1), commissioned by Editorial Office, critically reexamines the scope of Annals of Palliative Medicine based on a review of the disciplinary development and evolving definition of palliative medicine. While Annals of Palliative Medicine has always focused since its inception on providing up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers (2), the discipline of palliative medicine has evolved considerable since the first printed issue of the journal in 2012. This Editorial is a highly educational read and discusses the history of palliative medicine and then critically considers the definition of palliative medicine in the contact of varying existing definitions by major medical and other governing bodies. Next, Zhang and colleagues discuss how palliative medicine, palliative care, hospice care, supportive care, and public health palliative care are related. With such a critical assessment and the most up-to-date analysis of the definition of palliative medicine currently available, the authors then reassess the scope of Annals of Palliative Medicine . Recognizing a broad scope of palliative medicine, they defined eight primary focuses of scope for the journal to provide clearer guidance to authors, reviewers, readers, reviewers, and editors as follows (1): Reading this comprehensive Editorial, it is quite clear that palliative medicine has developed into a discipline with a broad scope, encompasses patients from hospice care to those with supportive care needs, and includes palliative care at all stages of various serious and life-threatening diseases and end-of-life situations. Editorial workflow improvements are also discussed, as is a commitment of Annals of Palliative Medicine to continually reassess the scope of palliative medicine and its increasing emphasis on symptom management and supportive care to best serve the needs of its readers and of palliative care and more expanded healthcare providers who rely on its content to inform them on how to provide the most optimal care for their patients (1). Furthermore, the November 2023 journal issue had a preponderance of oncology articles, with 4 of the 5 Original Articles and 16 of the 19 Review Articles focusing on oncology care in the palliative setting. The integration of palliative care with oncology care is a critical element of management in patients with advanced presentations of cancer, and it is a primary focus of this journal, as detailed above. As such, the remainder of this Message from the Editor-in-Chief will focus on one Review Article that discusses this integration between palliative care and oncology and provides commentary on the path ahead and optimizing this integration. Caglayan and colleagues from the United Kingdom detail how both the healthcare environment and the oncology treatment landscape have become progressively more intricate, necessitating providers caring for patients with cancer to become increasingly well versed in the best way to integrate palliative care with cancer care (3). Furthermore, the psychosocial care needs of patients with advanced cancers and their families are often distinct and influence management approaches. The authors describe the key elements of palliative care delivery and focus on early integration of palliative care in the comprehensive management of patients with advanced malignancies. Such early integration of palliative care for these patients has been widely reported in Annals of Palliative Medicine even since the first issues of this journal (4-6) as a means of better improving patient quality of life, symptom control, and patient and provider satisfaction. Such early integration can also reduce aggressive care at the end of life, increase rates of completing advanced directives, reduce hospitalizations, and shorten hospital lengths of stay, all of which can serve to reduce medical costs (7,8). Additionally, in select scenarios, such early integration of palliative care can also significantly improve patient survival (9,10). Caglayan and colleagues discuss the optimal timing of the referral to patient care for patients with advanced malignancies and what the optimal model for service delivery is for these patients. They also describe barriers—from education to resource availability—commonly encountered in the early integration of pall -Abstract Truncated-

Is shared decision making an aspect of palliative care integration? An observation of collaboration between oncologists and palliative care professionals

Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care: A systematic review and metasynthesis

The role of the multidisciplinary team in decision-making at the end of life: an analysis of integrated palliative care management

The focus on life-prolonging anticancer treatment hampers shared decision-making in people with advanced cancer: A qualitative embedded multiple-case study

Palliative and End of Life Care: An Important Component of Supportive Oncology

Barriers and facilitators of healthcare professionals in integrating shared decision‐making in pancreatic cancer treatment: A network approach

A multimethod analysis of shared decision-making in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings including family caregivers

The evolution of palliative medicine and its integration with oncology care

The bigger picture of shared decision making: A service design perspective using the care path of locally advanced pancreatic cancer as a case

Decision-making in palliative care: patient and family caregiver concordance and discordance—systematic review and narrative synthesis

How do Patients With Advanced Cancer and Family Caregivers Accommodate One Another in Decision-Making? Findings From a Qualitative Study in Specialist Palliative Care

Benchmarking palliative care practices in neurooncology: a german perspective

Early palliative care and its impact on end of life care

Integrating Shared Decision-Making into Undergraduate Oncology Education: A Pedagogical Framework

The Decision-Making Process for Palliative Sedation for Patients with Advanced Cancer–Analysis from a Systematic Review of Prospective Studies

A systematic review of the effectiveness of decision making interventions on increasing perceptions of shared decision making occurring in advanced cancer consultations

Shared Decision-Making in Managing Breakthrough Cancer Pain in Patients With Advanced Cancer

Current collaboration between palliative care and neurology: a survey of clinicians in Europe

Structure and integration of specialty palliative care in three NCI-designated cancer centers: a mixed methods case study

Decision making and cancer.

Implementing Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Stakeholder Engagement Principles in Models of Palliative Care Delivery and Advance Care Planning Research