Abstract:Introduction Shared decision‐making intends to align care provision with individuals' preferences. However, the involvement of people living with dementia in decision‐making about their care varies. We aimed to co‐design the EMBED‐Care Framework, to enhance shared decision‐making between people affected by dementia and practitioners. Methods A theory and evidence driven co‐design study was conducted, using iterative workshops, informed by a theoretical model of shared decision‐making and the EMBED‐Care Framework (the intervention) for person‐centred holistic palliative dementia care. The intervention incorporates a holistic outcome measure for assessment and review, linked with clinical decision‐support tools to support shared decision‐making. We drew on the Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions. Participants included people with dementia of any type, current or bereaved family carers and practitioners. We recruited via established dementia groups and research and clinical networks. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to explore how and when the intervention could enhance communication and shared decision‐making, and the requirements for use, presented as a logic model. Results Five co‐design workshops were undertaken with participants comprising people affected by dementia (n = 18) and practitioners (n = 36). Three themes were generated, comprising: (1) 'knowing the person and personalisation of care', involving the person with dementia and/or family carer identifying the needs of the person using a holistic assessment. (2) 'engaging and considering the perspectives of all involved in decision‐making' required listening to the person and the family to understand their priorities, and to manage multiple preferences. (3) 'Training and support activities' to use the Framework through use of animated videos to convey information, such as to understand the outcome measure used to assess symptoms. Conclusions The intervention developed sought to enhance shared decision‐making with individuals affected by dementia and practitioners, through increased shared knowledge of individual priorities and choices for care and treatment. The workshops generated understanding to manage disagreements in determining priorities. Practitioners require face‐to‐face training on the intervention, and on communication to manage sensitive conversations about symptoms, care and treatment with individuals and their family. The findings informed the construction of a logic model to illustrate how the intervention is intended to work.

A multimethod analysis of shared decision-making in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings including family caregivers

Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care: A systematic review and metasynthesis

Feeling responsible: Family caregivers' attitudes and experiences of shared decision-making regarding people diagnosed with schizophrenia: A qualitative study

How do Patients With Advanced Cancer and Family Caregivers Accommodate One Another in Decision-Making? Findings From a Qualitative Study in Specialist Palliative Care

Decision-making in palliative care: patient and family caregiver concordance and discordance—systematic review and narrative synthesis

Analysis of communication styles underpinning clinical decision-making in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings

Initiating Prognostic Talk During Hospice Multidisciplinary Team Meetings: A Conversation Analytic Study

The role of the multidisciplinary team in decision-making at the end of life: an analysis of integrated palliative care management

Time estimates in prognostic discussions: A conversation analytic study of hospice multidisciplinary team meetings

Family meetings in palliative care: Multidisciplinary clinical practice guidelines

Co‐design of the EMBED‐Care Framework as an intervention to enhance shared decision‐making for people affected by dementia and practitioners, comprising holistic assessment, linked with clinical decision support tools: A qualitative study

Involvement of family members of older patients with cancer in triadic decision-making processes during medical consultations on an outpatient ward - an observational exploratory study using quantitative and qualitative methods

The experience of palliative patients and their families of a family meeting utilised as an instrument for spiritual and psychosocial care: A qualitative study

Family Caregiver Communication and Perceptions of Involvement in Hospice Care

'So Let's Go On Like This?'—Shared Decision‐Making and the Use of Outcome Information in Routine Care Management for People With Multiple Sclerosis

The family meeting addressing spiritual and psychosocial needs in a palliative care setting: usefulness and challenges to implementation

Motivations of family advisors in engaging in research to improve a palliative approach to care for persons living with dementia: an interpretive descriptive study

Supportive care decision-making processes of persons with dementia and their caregivers

The Impact of a Shared Decision-Making Training Program on Dementia Care Planning in Long-Term Care

The focus on life-prolonging anticancer treatment hampers shared decision-making in people with advanced cancer: A qualitative embedded multiple-case study

Palliative Care Coordination Interventions for Caregivers of Community-Dwelling Individuals with Dementia: An Integrative Review