Energy‐Water Asynchrony Principally Determines Water Available for Runoff From Snowmelt in Continental Montane Forests

Ryan William Webb,John F. Knowles,Alex Fox,Alex Fabricus,Timothy Corrie,Kori Mooney,Jocelyn Gallais,Nana Afua Gyau Frimpong,Christopher Akuka Akurugu,Greg Barron‐Gafford,Peter D. Blanken,Sean P. Burns,John Frank,Marcy Litvak
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15297
IF: 3.784
2024-10-09
Hydrological Processes
Abstract:In this study, we present an empirical analysis that shows energy‐water (E‐W) Asynchrony is the principal control on water available for runoff (WAfR) and the ratio of actual evapotranspiration to precipitation (AET/P), often referred to as the aridity index. The intensity of surface water input (SWI) was a secondary control. Changes in the volume, rate, and timing of the snowmelt water pulse have profound implications for seasonal soil moisture, evapotranspiration (ET), groundwater recharge, and downstream water availability, especially in the context of climate change. Here, we present an empirical analysis of water available for runoff using five eddy covariance towers located in continental montane forests across a regional gradient of snow depth, precipitation seasonality, and aridity. We specifically investigated how energy‐water asynchrony (i.e., snowmelt timing relative to atmospheric demand), surface water input intensity (rain and snowmelt), and observed winter ET (winter AET) impact multiple water balance metrics that determine water available for runoff (WAfR). Overall, we found that WAfR had the strongest relationship with energy‐water asynchrony (adjusted r2 = 0.52) and that winter AET was correlated to total water year evapotranspiration but not to other water balance metrics. Stepwise regression analysis demonstrated that none of the tested mechanisms were strongly related to the Budyko‐type runoff anomaly (highest adjusted r2 = 0.21). We, therefore, conclude that WAfR from continental montane forests is most sensitive to the degree of energy‐water asynchrony that occurs. The results of this empirical study identify the physical mechanisms driving variability of WAfR in continental montane forests and are thus broadly relevant to the hydrologic management and modelling communities.
water resources
What problem does this paper attempt to address?