Incorporating Climate Nonstationarity And Snowmelt Processes In Intensity-Duration-Frequency Analyses With Case Studies In Mountainous Areas

Zhangshuan Hou,Huiying Ren,Ning Sun,Mark S. Wigmosta,Ying Liu,L. Ruby Leung,Hongxiang Yan,Richard Skaggs,Andre Coleman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0055.1
2019-01-01
Journal of Hydrometeorology
Abstract:Downscaled high-resolution climate simulations were used to provide inputs to the physics-based Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model (DHSVM), which accounts for the combined effects of snowmelt and rainfall processes, to determine spatially distributed available water for runoff (AWR). After quasi-stationary time windows were identified based on model outputs extracted for two different mountainous field sites in Colorado and California, intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) curves for precipitation and AWR were generated and evaluated at each numerical grid to provide guidance on hydrological infrastructure design. Impacts of snowmelt are found to be spatially variable due to spatial heterogeneity associated with topography according to geostatistical analyses. AWR extremes have stronger spatial continuity compared to precipitation. Snowmelt impacts on AWR are more pronounced at the wet California site than at the semiarid Colorado site. The sensitivities of AWR and precipitation IDFs to increasing greenhouse gas emissions are found to be localized and spatially variable. In subregions with significant snowfall, snowmelt can result in an AWR (e.g., 6-h 100-yr events) that is 70% higher than precipitation. For comparison, future greenhouse gas emissions may increase 6-h 100-yr precipitation and AWR by up to 50% and 80%, respectively, toward the end of this century.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?