Fasciocutaneous and jejunal free flaps for circumferential hypopharyngeal defect reconstruction: A 22‐year multicenter cohort study

Anthony M. Tonsbeek,Caroline A. Hundepool,Merel M. Smit,Pieter S. Verduijn,Liron S. Duraku,Aniel Sewnaik,Bas P. L. Wijnhoven,Marc A. M. Mureau
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.27667
2024-02-01
Head & Neck
Abstract:Background It remains unclear whether a tubed fasciocutaneous or jejunal free flap (FCFF and JFF) is preferable for reconstruction of circumferential pharyngolaryngoesophageal defects. Methods All consecutive patients with circumferential pharyngolaryngoesophageal defects reconstructed with an FCFF or JFF between 2000 and 2022 were included. Outcomes of interest were rates of fistulas, strictures, and donor‐site complications. Results In total, 112 patients were included (35 FCFFs and 77 JFFs). Fistula and stricture rates were significantly lower following JFF compared to FCFF reconstructions, with 12% versus 34% (p = 0.008) and 29% versus 49% (p = 0.04), respectively. Severe donor‐site complications leading to surgical intervention or ICU admittance only occurred after JFF reconstructions (18%, p = 0.007). Conclusions The high fistula and stricture rates in FCFF reconstructions and the rate of severe abdominal complications in JFF reconstructions illustrate inherent procedure‐specific advantages and disadvantages. Relative pros and cons should be carefully weighed when tailoring treatments to the individual needs of patients.
surgery,otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?