Abstract:Importance: Implemented in 18 regions, Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) was the largest US primary care delivery model ever tested. Understanding its association with health outcomes is critical in designing future transformation models. Objective: To test whether CPC+ was associated with lower health care spending and utilization and improved quality of care. Design, setting, and participants: Difference-in-differences regression models compared changes in outcomes between the year before CPC+ and 5 intervention years for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries attributed to CPC+ and comparison practices. Participants included 1373 track 1 (1 549 585 beneficiaries) and 1515 track 2 (5 347 499 beneficiaries) primary care practices that applied to start CPC+ in 2017 and met minimum care delivery and other eligibility requirements. Comparison groups included 5243 track 1 (5 347 499 beneficiaries) and 3783 track 2 (4 507 499 beneficiaries) practices, matched, and weighted to have similar beneficiary-, practice-, and market-level characteristics as CPC+ practices. Interventions: Two-track design involving enhanced (higher for track 2) and alternative payments (track 2 only), care delivery requirements (greater for track 2), data feedback, learning, and health information technology support. Main outcomes and measures: The prespecified primary outcome was annualized Medicare Part A and B expenditures per beneficiary per month (PBPM). Secondary outcomes included expenditure categories, utilization (eg, hospitalizations), and claims-based quality-of-care process and outcome measures (eg, recommended tests for patients with diabetes and unplanned readmissions). Results: Among the CPC+ patients, 5% were Black, 3% were Hispanic, 87% were White, and 5% were of other races (including Asian/Other Pacific Islander and American Indian); 85% of CPC+ patients were older than 65 years and 58% were female. CPC+ was associated with no discernible changes in the total expenditures (track 1: $1.1 PBPM [90% CI, -$4.3 to $6.6], P = .74; track 2: $1.3 [90% CI, -$5 to $7.7], P = .73), and with increases in expenditures including enhanced payments (track 1: $13 [90% CI, $7 to $18], P < .001; track 2: $24 [90% CI, $18 to $31], P < .001). Among secondary outcomes, CPC+ was associated with decreases in emergency department visits starting in year 1, and in acute hospitalizations and acute inpatient expenditures in later years. Associations were more favorable for practices also participating in the Medicare Shared Savings Program and independent practices. CPC+ was not associated with meaningful changes in claims-based quality-of-care measures. Conclusions and relevance: Although the timing of the associations of CPC+ with reduced utilization and acute inpatient expenditures was consistent with the theory of change and early focus on episodic care management of CPC+, CPC+ was not associated with a reduction in total expenditures over 5 years. Positive interaction between CPC+ and the Shared Savings Program suggests transformation models might be more successful when provider cost-reduction incentives are aligned across specialties. Further adaptations and testing of primary care transformation models, as well as consideration of the larger context in which they operate, are needed.

Direct Primary Care: Financial Analysis and Potential to Reshape the U.S. Healthcare Landscape

How An Academic Direct Primary Care Clinic Served Patients from Vulnerable Communities

The Comprehensive Primary Care Plus Model and Health Care Spending, Service Use, and Quality

Primary Care in a New Era: Disillusion and Dissolution?

Keeping candles lit: The role of concierge medicine in the future of primary care

Beyond demonstrations: implementing a primary care hybrid payment model in Medicare

Primary Care Behavioral Health Integration and Care Utilization: Implications for Patient Outcome and Healthcare Resource Use

Evaluating the cost of NP-led vs. GP-led primary care in British Columbia

Long-Term Effects of the Comprehensive Primary Care Model on Health Care Spending and Utilization

Estimating the Costs of Implementing Comprehensive Primary Care: A Narrative Review

Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Urgent Need to Expand Primary Care and Family Medicine

How to Pay for Health Care

A Case Study of a Team-Based, Quality-Focused Compensation Model for Primary Care Providers

Physician Response to Prices of Other Physicians: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Association Between the Implementation of a Population-Based Primary Care Payment System and Achievement on Quality Measures in Hawaii

Primary care payment models and avoidable hospitalizations in Ontario, Canada: A multivalued treatment effects analysis

Physical Therapists in Primary Care in the United States: An Overview of Current Practice Models and Implementation Strategies

Primary Care Practice Structural Capabilities and Emergency Department Utilization Among High-Need High-Cost Patients

The Community Primary Care Champions Fellowship: a mixed methods evaluation of an interprofessional fellowship for physician assistants and physicians

First Contact Physiotherapy: A 4-Year Service Evaluation of UK Primary Care Data

Is the Centralization of Complex Surgical Procedures an Unintended Spillover Effect of Global Capitation? – Insights from the Maryland Global Budget Revenue Program